Le new meme: accuse BiPolarBear0 of something with no evidence. . . oh wait that's old. /r/worldnews debates which government /u/BiPolarBear0 works for and if he is multiple people sharing an account. (np.reddit.com)
SubredditDrama
102 ups - 0 downs = 102 votes
191 comments submitted at 18:23:45 on Jul 15, 2014 by imakuram
I like how /u/cafi couldn't even make up a specific action that /u/BipolarBear0 has taken that they disagree with. They apparently need help when it comes to that sort of stuff...you know, the evidence and reasoning stuff.
Good thing we can look at his moderation logs for evidence - oh wait, we can't actually see what he does as a mod or what he removes or what comments he deletes.
Of course he mocks those who say there should be some transparency in action, because it would give people the evidence they need to demonstrate what a terrible mod he is:
http://i.imgur.com/FrpLkDx.png
Seems like a personal grudge more than anything.
You seem like a default mod defending another default mod more than anything.
And that was my first interaction with BipolarBear0 - do you consider it proper behavior for mods to mock those who ask for transparency?
You asked for a concrete action from BipolarBear0 and I showed you one, but I see evidence gets voted down while mocking gets upvoted.
Yup, thanks for the concrete example of him removing a post that broke their rules...which happened to be your article, which you argued with them about and then he made a joke.
Hilarious joke: "Dance peon, dance if you want to know what is being removed from the news"
/r/news ≠ the news
Did I miss the other officially sanctioned subreddit for US news?
Officially sanctioned??
Admins chose it as a default. It is what is presented to all new users as "Reddit" and as "news" by the decisions of the admins.
More Comments - Click Here