Guy is mad that female friend hooked up with his buddy. Girl shows up to defend herself. (self.SubredditDrama)

SubredditDrama

127 ups - 41 downs = 86 votes

John also showed up.

[Updated. Here is the thread, including Emily's response /u/emily1002] (http://www.redditlog.com/snapshots/605869)

132 comments submitted at 14:21:42 on May 20, 2014 by fussycakes

  • [-]
  • johnlocke91
  • -11 Points
  • 15:26:00, 20 May

This is pretty obviously a troll(no way all those people just happen to post in the thread), but if it isn't, that group has a lot of issues.

  1. The OP seems to have a white knight complex for Emily.

  2. Emily has some serious emotional problems(friend just introduced her to his social group, immediately finds and fucks one of them).

  • [-]
  • CantaloupeCamper
  • 19 Points
  • 15:32:03, 20 May

I don't even know if it is even white knight... I think he is just pissed he didn't get her.

  • [-]
  • nickolasz
  • 8 Points
  • 15:46:01, 20 May

Yeah I agree, saying that she's fragile etc. he might be considered white knighting but I think that's just a cover to try and make him sound like he cares about her, where as he clearly just wants to get in her pants.

  • [-]
  • CantaloupeCamper
  • 4 Points
  • 15:49:19, 20 May

I think they're little judgmental comments to lead the audience (intentionally or not) to reasons she would do such a wrong thing...

  • [-]
  • Somenakedguy
  • 15 Points
  • 15:51:30, 20 May

>Emily has some serious emotional problems(friend just introduced her to his social group, immediately finds and fucks one of them).

Is this really that strange? It was at a party, it was the guy's birthday, and from the sound of it she knew these people but just wasn't part of the "group". I don't see how that translates to serious emotional problems.

  • [-]
  • johnlocke91
  • -8 Points
  • 15:59:02, 20 May

I was just going off the OP. If she already knew the people, then it wouldn't be nearly as serious. Although it would still be annoying if it was a small party.

  • [-]
  • rhythmguy
  • 1 Points
  • 19:37:11, 20 May

What, a girl isn't allowed to fuck a guy she meets at a party?

  • [-]
  • grapefruitgreatfruit
  • 27 Points
  • 15:45:39, 20 May

Wait, so when a woman meets and has a one night stand with a man she has "some serious emotional" problems?

  • [-]
  • johnlocke91
  • -15 Points
  • 15:53:51, 20 May

Context matters. If the OP was telling the truth, he literally just introduced her to a small group of his friends. She should be trying to get to know people and make a good first impression. If her first thought is "I should fuck one of his friends" then yeah she has issues.

Second, this wasn't even a one night stand. More like a 60 minute stand. If she had waited until the party was over to hook up, there probably wouldn't have been an issue.

  • [-]
  • grapefruitgreatfruit
  • 22 Points
  • 16:20:18, 20 May

There shouldn't have been an issue anyway. People hook up at parties all the time. Who cares? Does it really make a difference that they hooked up at the party as opposed to after it?

I don't understand the dichotomy- either she just wants to get to know people OR her first thought is "I should fuck one of his friends." Maybe she met this guy, they were chatting all night, they BOTH wanted to have sex, so they did. And this is somehow indicative of serious emotional problems? Is it not possible that she was just horny and thought the guy was good looking or funny or charming or what have you and wanted to have sex with him?

  • [-]
  • johnlocke91
  • -5 Points
  • 17:03:51, 20 May

This was a small gathering. If I set aside time to hang out with my friends, I expect them to actually hang out. I would not be happy if two of them(especially the host) disappeared during the party.

  • [-]
  • Andr3wsky
  • 17 Points
  • 17:15:38, 20 May

You've never "disappeared" during a party, J.L.? Never met a woman (or man) that you just hit it off with right away? You've never looked at someone and were certain, more than anything else in life, that you wanted them, then and there. And then you walked over, steam metaphorically rising underneath your collar, your body overheating with sheer exertion it took NOT to rip your clothes off, the whole of your being focused on bridling your rapidly unbridling lust. "Hello," you said. "I need you."

And maybe they feel the same way. Maybe it's pheromones, maybe it's brain chemistry, maybe it's the pure bliss of happenstance, but she (or he) decides she (or he) also must have you. Must feel the weight of your body pressing into her (or him). The erotic electricity of the moment is too tempting pass up. And Shhh. Shhh. No names. We don't need names tonight. We only need each other, and this broom closet, and maybe one or two Natty Lights in Solo cups from the keg our friend purchased. For we are free. We are modern. And we love.

And it happens. Oh god it happens. Pure desire. Pure exhilaration. Pure release. And you both sit back panting, overcome with emotions. And in that moment: you, my friend, are alive.

That, uh, that never happen to you /u/JohnLocke91?

  • [-]
  • DuchessSandwich
  • 4 Points
  • 17:31:34, 20 May

I think I love you, /u/Andr3wsky.

  • [-]
  • lifestyled
  • 2 Points
  • 18:05:12, 20 May

Is this copypasta?

  • [-]
  • grapefruitgreatfruit
  • 6 Points
  • 17:17:48, 20 May

Well that's completely different from your first argument. Being upset with your friend for disappearing and sleeping with another girl at your party is one (understandable) thing, saying that the girl who was involved had serious emotional problems because of her actions is another.

  • [-]
  • fussycakes
  • 18 Points
  • 15:58:29, 20 May

I don't think Emily has any problems. Does John have emotional problems for wanting to get laid by a stranger? No. Chicks like to get laid too - I don't really follow your line of reasoning.

  • [-]
  • Gauntlet_of_Might
  • 9 Points
  • 17:36:43, 20 May

I think his reasoning is misogyny

  • [-]
  • DblackRabbit
  • 24 Points
  • 15:27:48, 20 May

This isn't apparently the first time Emily met the friend, and apparently went on a date before this party. OP is really not good with remembering detail apparently.

  • [-]
  • johnlocke91
  • 3 Points
  • 15:46:23, 20 May

I have noticed this weird trend on Reddit where people trust whoever was the last one to post. Its also possible Emily was lying. We have no more reason to truth her than the OP.

  • [-]
  • DblackRabbit
  • 16 Points
  • 15:48:17, 20 May

Its easier that believe OP exaggerated vs everyone was acting like 15 y.o. kids at an older sister's party.

  • [-]
  • johnlocke91
  • 0 Points
  • 15:57:40, 20 May

If this was a small social group(6-8 people), it would be pretty hard not to notice that the host just snuck off with the new girl. Some awkwardness is understandable.

  • [-]
  • DblackRabbit
  • 10 Points
  • 16:02:46, 20 May

>However, off in the corner, John and Emily started getting extremely touchy-feely. I could tell that Emily initiated first, because she was stroking his arm and apparently was trying to kiss him.

>The rest of my friends (there were seven of us, five guys and two girls) soon started staring and whispering

this is either

A.) exaggeration

B.) cooties

  • [-]
  • Mediddly
  • 5 Points
  • 18:56:13, 20 May

They're friends, why on earth would the absence of their host for 45 minutes lead to total social breakdown?

  • [-]
  • beanfiddler
  • 11 Points
  • 16:10:59, 20 May

I really don't think that someone has "emotional problems" because they like to hook up with people. I do find it curious, though, that Emily is the one of the emotional problem and not John, who did the exact same thing as she did.

  • [-]
  • LATINA_ON_WELFARE
  • 4 Points
  • 18:01:56, 20 May

Based on the language and tone of the OP's post, which is filled to the brim with Victorian indignation, I think it's a troll, too.

I'm pretty sure it's meant to troll vaguely misogynistic people like you who agree that Emily is some kind of vile skankubus because OP's friend had sex in his own home, at his own party.

  • [-]
  • Gauntlet_of_Might
  • 5 Points
  • 17:34:39, 20 May

Whats the proper waiting period for a woman to have sex? Just curious.

  • [-]
  • fussycakes
  • 4 Points
  • 19:11:19, 20 May

The answer is: whenever the fuck she wants.

  • [-]
  • Gauntlet_of_Might
  • 0 Points
  • 19:33:46, 20 May

Uhhh if she has "severe emotional problems' maybe

  • [-]
  • jamdaman
  • 3 Points
  • 19:16:40, 20 May

With all the correct forms signed, stamped, reviewed, and finalized?...approximately 12 days

  • [-]
  • GigglyHyena
  • 1 Points
  • 19:26:31, 20 May

She has to ask permission of everyone in the party first, of course.

  • [-]
  • johnlocke91
  • -1 Points
  • 19:08:43, 20 May

After the party.