/u/Katie_Pornhub enters /r/nofap, is accused of objectifying women, promoting unhealthy addictions, stealing from other corporations, and being mean on the Internet. "Edit: downvote me all you want. I firmly stand by what I said." (np.reddit.com)

SubredditDrama

177 ups - 53 downs = 124 votes

173 comments submitted at 05:56:18 on May 1, 2014 by fernsauce

  • [-]
  • masterstick8
  • -20 Points
  • 06:28:43, 1 May

Can we just step back and look at this woman for a moment.

This is a group of people, for the most part, trying to better themselves. They aren't a group with a ton of self-control, or didn't come in with it. And she is mocking them. The way she "mocked" the Denver Broncos.

"Katie" isn't a stellar human being, but she is being idolized by reddit(similar to Bill Nye) because she is somewhat attractive and "clever".

Her last 6 posts are titled, and I quote:

"Cock is meant to be shared"

"Hypnotic(NSFW)"

"Hungry for Jizz"

"Eye contact is important(NSFW)"

"Tatooed babe gets fucked"

"Butt Jiggle"

I get that she is a spokesperson, but you think for all the "womyn"-power that goes on here, that at least someone would point out how bad of a person she is.

  • [-]
  • the_popcorn_pisser
  • 16 Points
  • 06:58:38, 1 May

Yeah you are kinda confusing your issues there buddy. I don't see what being a woman has to do with anything.

  • [-]
  • dumnezero
  • 8 Points
  • 09:06:11, 1 May

~~woman~~ Evil Temptress Sent By Satan

  • [-]
  • Mircy
  • 8 Points
  • 07:15:57, 1 May

So she's bad... for submitting porn links?

[check it out I do that too] (http://www.reddit.com/user/Mircy/submitted/)

advice for the young at heart: don't go past the first page

  • [-]
  • SexSellsCoffee
  • 4 Points
  • 07:21:22, 1 May

Oh wow you're such a piece of fap waste. Those links doe. Didn't even know those fetishes were a thing.

  • [-]
  • Mircy
  • 7 Points
  • 07:27:05, 1 May

Welcome to the wonderful world of human sexuality!!

  • [-]
  • SamWhite
  • 1 Points
  • 08:51:48, 1 May

Argh, now I'm really curious what they are but I'm at work.

  • [-]
  • snorting_dandelions
  • 1 Points
  • 10:45:17, 1 May

Literally bloody bitches(not to be objectifying of women, I just really wanted to use that alliteration)

  • [-]
  • SamWhite
  • 1 Points
  • 10:52:08, 1 May

Oh god, I think I already know that subreddit.

  • [-]
  • sp8der
  • -1 Points
  • 09:30:28, 1 May

oh mircy, i feel like we'd be friends

  • [-]
  • masterstick8
  • -11 Points
  • 07:21:26, 1 May

Yes, you got me.

Submitting others creations for recreational use is literally the exact same thing as being the face for a multi-million dollar company and working for them everyday.

How could I be so blind?

  • [-]
  • Mircy
  • 8 Points
  • 07:27:41, 1 May

So... you're pissed at her for submitting porn from her own company?

  • [-]
  • masterstick8
  • -9 Points
  • 07:32:14, 1 May

Excellent way to miss the point twice.

Yes, that is the reason I'm "mad"(Though, I believe I've been quite calm).

The hypocrisy is a little funny, but thats about it.

  • [-]
  • Mircy
  • 6 Points
  • 07:36:11, 1 May

then why list the links at all? her joke was in poor taste but listing her submissions had nothing to do with her

  • [-]
  • SexSellsCoffee
  • 7 Points
  • 06:47:31, 1 May

What does her previous posts have to do with anything? Does what she do for a living make her a bad person?

Porn is a decisive issue when it comes to feminism. Some think it is exploitation and some empowering. Lol womyn power. Any mention of feminism draws out the antisrs crowd.

  • [-]
  • masterstick8
  • -14 Points
  • 07:11:19, 1 May

>What does her previous posts have to do with anything?

I would argue everything. The nature of the issue is what her intentions were, just as there is Homicide and Manslaughter.

Why would the woman who makes rape jokes(Something the "srs crowd" vilifies), actually objectifies women(regardless of where you stand on the empowerment/enslavement debate, "slut swallows loads of cum" is objectification) and is just an overall, in my opinion, less than perfect human being(feet of clay and so on) suddenly make "light hearted jabs"?

How is her "I praised them in the past, so I can make fun of them now" or "its just a joke" different than what reddit, the supposed "antisrs" crowd?

But she gets a pass on this, because.... Why exactly?

>Does what she do for a living make her a bad person?

This falls into the "Common sense Jesus" section for me. "I won't do X/Y/Z because I'm X/Y/Z". As long as its not difficult. There is no one forcing her to take this job, though I suppose the same argument could be made for the porn "actors/actresses" in the first place, no?

> Any mention of feminism draws out the antisrs crowd.

Your bias is showing.

If I have to put my foot in my mouth, I will. But nothing I've seen points to our dear friend Katie being anything more than a cog in a machine that thrives on base instinct.

  • [-]
  • SexSellsCoffee
  • 13 Points
  • 07:16:24, 1 May

I don't know how to respond to this comment so I'm gonna walk away from this conversation

  • [-]
  • snorting_dandelions
  • 2 Points
  • 10:42:42, 1 May

>> Does what she do for a living make her a bad person? > > This falls into the "Common sense Jesus" section for me. "I won't do X/Y/Z because I'm X/Y/Z". As long as its not difficult. There is no one forcing her to take this job, though I suppose the same argument could be made for the porn "actors/actresses" in the first place, no?

Jesus H. Christ, just say yes or no, it's not that hard.

  • [-]
  • MarcelleGriffin
  • 3 Points
  • 11:44:19, 1 May

I'm going to attempt to answer all of this bullshit.

One) Porn, as least to this feminist, isn't objectifying. People cannot help their sexual attractions and if "slut takes a load of cum" really turns you on then watch it. The woman in the video, hopefully, enjoys taking loads of cum. She loves sex so I don't get how that objectifies if she feels empowered by choosing who, when, and how she gets fucked and how often then I'd say that's empowerment.

Two) Even so, whether she was a good/bad person is inconsequential to this moment here. It has nothing to do with the drama at all.

Three) >This falls into the "Common sense Jesus" section for me. "I won't do X/Y/Z because I'm X/Y/Z". As long as its not difficult. There is no one forcing her to take this job, though I suppose the same argument could be made for the porn "actors/actresses" in the first place, no?

I still cannot decipher this. Are you saying that if she was a feminist she should not do porn? Is she a feminist? Are you saying if she's a woman she shouldn't? I'm at a lost. Either way what she doesn't isn't evil, it doesn't hurt anyone, she isn't racist toward people, I don't think it's sexist, and it doesn't violate the law.....so.... I'd say you're wrong here.

Four) yes she gets a pass. Not because she praised them in the past but because she didn't do anything wrong in the current drama. Much like the antisrs people until they even so much as get a whiff of feminism their real enemy. And the one of the only reasons SRS takes so much shit.

  • [-]
  • Velaryon
  • 3 Points
  • 07:12:48, 1 May

womyn?