SRS Discussion asks, "Why does it seem that most societies are patriarchies?". When someone proposes that it's because men are naturally stronger, one SRSer absolutely loses her shit. (np.reddit.com)
SubredditDrama
160 ups - 77 downs = 83 votes
221 comments submitted at 07:06:21 on Apr 28, 2014 by bluemayhem
It's like Watchmen. But who checks the privilege of the privilege checkers?
Me.
You are a demisexual? I don't think you're as impartial as you claim to be. Especially considering your extensive post history in AMR.
Where did they claim to be impartial? Also, if anything, the comment you're responding to is going along with mocking the SJW side of the argument so why does it matter?
> going along with mocking the SJW side of the argumen
I DONT KNOW WHAT SARCASM IS SOMEONE PLS EXPLAIN
Apparently that's the case dude because I am currently very confused. I hereby relinquish my position in this conversation and will now curl up in a confused ball and whimper.
Yeah I'm demisexual. Yeah I post in AMR. I don't see your point?
Well the demisexual thing was more of an actual question. You realize the shockingly recent history of that term right? And that it's first appearance was on a roleplaying message board? Demisexuality isn't a real thing. Having a preference for relationships over casual sex isn't a sexuality, that isn't what a sexuality means.
> Yeah I post in AMR.
Well, that speaks to your objectivity. You are in this thread purporting yourself to be an uninterested third party watching the drama. You aren't. You are an interested party, and what's more you're so interested you frequent an antagonistic sub. That's my point.
Random user makes a joke post about nothing important, so you repudiate and question their history? This seems really out of left field and I don't understand.
I don't like people who have an agenda pretending they don't have an agenda.
Like you? You wouldn't have responded to a random post this way unless you have a personal agenda.
I just told you my agenda. I don't like people pretending they don't have an agenda when they do. That was my entire motivation.
^^At ^^risk ^^of ^^following ^^the ^^cliche,
#REKT
^^Edit: ^^I ^^spoke ^^too ^^soon. ^^Complete ^^demolition ^^below.
Well it's your opinion that it's an antagonistic sub. And thank you again for telling me my sexuality isn't real I appreciate that. If you want you can call it gray-asexuality although that's a different thing entirely.
Sexuality = Sexual attraction. It's not preferring relationships to casual sex. It's literally not being attracted sexually to anyone unless I'm emotionally connected to them.
> Well it's your opinion that it's an antagonistic sub.
No, it isn't my opinion. First off, the name is "against mens rights" which in an of itself is antagonistic. Never mind the fact that antagonistic really just means "alligned against".
> And thank you again for telling me my sexuality isn't real I appreciate that
It isn't real. It was invented on a roleplaying forum 5 years ago by a 15 year old girl that wanted to make a slutty character. I am telling you that your sexualitity isn't real because demisexuality isn't real. Real sexualities can be observed by psychologists. You realize their is a nuerochemical as well as physiological response to sexual attraction that can be measured? Has a doctor ran tests on you to confirm your demisexuality? Like they would for asexuality, by the way. Not having sexual attraction is a serious medical condition that can be indicative of hundreds of different illnesses. If you want to change your claim to claiming you are a gray-asexual, fine. That's actually a thing.
> Sexuality = Sexual attraction.
No. Not necessarily.
> It's not preferring relationships to casual sex.
That's exactly what it was created to be, though. That's what you don't seem to want to understand. Doesn't matter what you define it as. Matters what it is.
> It's literally not being attracted sexually to anyone unless I'm emotionally connected to them.
Which would mean, for the purposes of summary and ease of communication, you prefer relationship to casual sex, right? Why do you think you're some special snowflake that needs a special sexuality invented recently? You aren't and you don't.
No. If I had a friend I had an emotional bond with and I wanted to fuck them, we could fuck casually and still be just friends. I don't get what your fucking problem is.
[deleted]
no personal attacks or flamewarring
Cool beans. You sent them a message too about flamewarring right? Have you seen their history in your sub? It's every single "gender wars" thread nothing but vitriol. I mean... SRD mods wouldn't be uneven in their application of the rules would they?
More Comments - Click Here
[deleted]