Argument in /r/relationships over whether a sexually inexperienced man being disappointed in the way his girlfriend looks naked makes him a "pathetic, entitled ignoramus." (np.reddit.com)
SubredditDrama
104 ups - 32 downs = 72 votes
95 comments submitted at 14:18:16 on Apr 10, 2014 by potato1
Sorry but that thread is useless without naked pics of the OP so we can judge for ourselves.
Edit: Pardon me for trying to bring some humor into a subreddit that's sole purpose is to make fun of drama on reddit...
Sorry we weren't bowled over by your hilarious comment about seeing a woman naked "FOR LE SCIENCE LOL XD"
The post has nothing to do with how she looks. It's about his reaction to seeing her naked for the first time. She could have green skin and be covered in warts for all I care; it doesn't justify choosing such a vulnerable moment to tell someone they're not as attractive as you'd like.
Well, she did ask him to explain, and it seems as though the way he reacted made it pretty clear how he felt anyway, she just asked him in order to be sure. I think the real problem is that the guy probably has very unrealistic ideas about what women should look like, and I think she's probably better off knowing that about him right off the bat.
It's a joke. No serious response needed.
Obviously my attempt at humor has flow over several people's heads.
Your attempt at humor didn't go over anybody's heads. It went under their shoes.
Whatever. It made me laugh and that's really all that matters (to me)
Ah yes , clearly that is the case.
I wasn't sure if you were being serious or just gross. I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt.
It was neither serious or gross. It was funny.
That being said, if OP wants to feel better about herself she should just post to /r/gonewild :)
>It was funny.
And I'm sure it would've gone over quite well in /r/funny. However, we have standards in SRD, no matter how low.
> However, we have standards in SRD, no matter how low.
TIL
Humor is usually supposed to be funny.