Mods add new trigger warning flair for dieting posts in /r/running. Users are not happy. Caution:Enjoy this popcorn at your own risk! (self.SubredditDrama)
SubredditDrama
332 ups - 102 downs = 230 votes
The /r/running mods have introduced new flair options for posts in their community. While other new tags include Gear, Training, and Injury. Some users are miffed by the inclusion of the TW (Trigger Warning) tag which is to be included if the post talks about dieting, BMI, or body fat issues.
Some buttery bits...
The only people who demand trigger warnings are assholes looking for attention. Why indulge them?
Some drama from the comments backing the mods.
206 comments submitted at 02:59:00 on Oct 28, 2013 by timfoil
Don't you find it ironic srss is more of a circlejerk than srs at this point?
SRSsucks is definitely a circlejerk, but moreso of one than SRS? Don't kid yourself.
You all speak in ironic sarcasm when presented with something against your viewpoint as if it proves something, circle jerk anything anti srs no matter how feasible the truth is, ban dissenters (I was banned for just coming there to disagree, inortus for being sarcastic, plenty of other people are banned for doing the same). You all preach this anti SJW mantra like zealots and have 0 room for someone that disagrees with it in any level, call people who aren't even srs srsers, etc. You show up everywhere and "something something srs" no matter what's actually going on. It's all terribly ironic. But don't let it stop you, it's also incredibly hilarious.
Edit: Let's not forget the admins you complain to about srs has called out srss for being worse than what they hate srs for: brigading and being "nuisances." I'm willing to be that sub has more shadow bans than a lot of other subs combined.
I don't speak for the administration nor the moderation of the sub, but acting like SRSsucks is more of an echo chamber than SRS is ludicrous.
No, it's not. I've presented my case. You presented "nah uh." I think we're done here.
None of what you said supports your claim that SRSsucks is guilty of being "more of a circlejerk". Your argument merely establishes that SRSsucks is a circlejerk, which I acknowledged.
edit: On top of this, I can't speak for why some users are banned, but I can bring up many threads where dissenting opinions are at least permitted to exist, even if they are downvoted into oblivion.
Yes it does. You have nothing. I'm done with you.
If you're bored, take some time to look over this exchange and examine why your case doesn't back your original statement. Use this information for future discussion.
You mean realize you had nothing to offer but "no" in a verbose form. You're intellectually inept or in denial. I didn't gain anything from this exchange but a slight pity for you.
Everything that you claimed can be said for SRS.
SRS bans every dissenter and deletes their comments, while SRSsucks permits several differing opinions which can be highlighted at any given point.
SRS often claims that every post which is high-lighted in their sub is indicative of a racist, white, neckbeard misogynist - going above and beyond to take posts out of context so that they can freely stereotype without having to question it.
If someone is not caucasian or male, then they are a special snowflake which only reaffirms the circlejerk. Some SRSsucks users are very paranoid, I agree, but they acknowledge that there are differing, valid opinions.
I don't care about the admins and I would like to see some actual data about brigading, given the difference of subscriber size between the two subs.
edit: formatting edit 2: I'm at least attempting a better comparison than you are. Quite frankly, I'm not pleased with your presentation as you only present one side without addressing the other, which shows your bias much more clearly than mine.
> I was banned for just coming there to disagree,
You mean from SRS? Or do you actually think that SRS doesn't do that?
They were banned not for "disagreeing" like they said, but for doing nothing but posting things to try and rile up our users.
In addition, we banned one of the admins for the same reason - not for being sarcastic.
Just another example of them playing the victim, but it seems like no one fell for it.
Way to address one point, and way for 3 of you to reply in minutes.
I'm sorry, I'll work on my ability to psychically predict who will reply other than myself. Especially with people I have never interacted with before. It's tougher then, since they're not in my usual psychic communication group.
I don't care about your points. That one just seemed more ironic, hypocritical, and/or amazingly not self aware than most. So I was curious if you didn't realize it, or I misunderstood. It appears I did not misunderstand, and you are that deluded.
Edit: And there were only 2 of us that replied yet, so I'm not sure what you're on about anyway.
I never said I care about my points. Stop with the projections.
I'm not even sure what to say to that. Way to address zero points, I guess.
They're not points. You're just rambling about "points" and "delusions" with no examples out of context.