Homophobia drama over a South Park joke. 154 children. SRS makes a guest appearance! (np.reddit.com)
SubredditDrama
104 ups - 30 downs = 74 votes
175 comments submitted at 17:48:18 on Sep 30, 2013 by IWannaFuckEllenPage
Homophobia drama over a South Park joke. 154 children. SRS makes a guest appearance! (np.reddit.com)
SubredditDrama
104 ups - 30 downs = 74 votes
175 comments submitted at 17:48:18 on Sep 30, 2013 by IWannaFuckEllenPage
Wow. Honestly how the fuck does SRS still get away with brigading this hard every single fuckin day.....
Well there was a time that SRD banned all SRS drama off the frontpage, how did they manage to achieve that? Suddenly SRD was being called a brigade instead. Note that SRS has never accepted the .np script, well a lot of the users wanted it but the mods didn't think it was a good idea.
> Well there was a time that SRD banned all SRS drama off the frontpage
Yeah I was around when that decision was made. You know why it was made? To protect SRS from brigades from SRD. To insulate all criticism of SRS on SRD to a single, easily ignored placed.
Why? Because SRD mods are sympathetic to if not in fact SRSters.
Heh it was kind of funny when SRSer /u/greenduch was modded here by one of the older mods (forgot who) and it backfired pretty hard. I'm surprised they didn't mod an alt instead.
I like how she immediately ran a script that started banning users. I don't remember how many, but I'm sure it was in the hundreds.
And it was a pain in the ass to clean up.
I was one of the lucky few! :D
>surprised they didn't mod an alt
The first time...
Their response was hilarious, too. Oh, sorry, we talked about it on irc and everyone was cool with it so...
They didn't ban SRS drama. They put it in a weekly round-up. And people talk shit about SRS all the time here without the mods doing anything. ShitRedditSays is a subreddit full of angry activists and trolls. They aren't the fucking Illuminati.
Yes and participation and viewing of that drama dropped by at least 50%. It was a concerted effort to move SRS drama into a single place so that it could be easily ignored by the SRD subscribers and mods who think SRS somehow not a terrible hive of scum.
who are they? Im still trying to get an idea of who they are
/r/ShitRedditSays
I kind of imagine them as that weird part of tumblr where just being a male is a crime, except instead of being on tumblr they discovered Reddit and their sole purpose is to be offended by everyone and everything.
They also love blueish colors. Especially when they point down.
Also, they seriously give us gay people a bad name. Don't worry people, most of us feel like we're allies, not enemies, of straight people.
Most SRSers are straight white men.
> Most SRSers are straight white manginas
FTFY
The fact that they're "fruit baskets" makes sense, in this case.
What I love is that they think they have the definitive definition of what an ally is. Anyone else, including minorities of any description, cannot decide for themselves what an ally is. The predominantly white and male subreddits called the "fempire" have been host to some spectacular displays of racism, sexism, and general discrimination toward "special snowflakes". Which is their preferred version of "race traitor".
[deleted]
no the majority on reddit is still the majority in SRS. there's an overwhelming majority of straigh white cis men
Im just wondering who they are in real life. Are they actually mad or do they just like to get offended in a troll type way?
they're from somethingawful rather than tumblr. There was a group on somethingawful that used to essentially do what SRS does today, and when a subreddit was made for it they migrated here
You know there just trolls right? The creator said he made it just to piss people off.
See, that's the thing. The guy made it to troll. Then people started actually taking it seriously.
Just imagine any bad thing that happens anywhere on reddit. They are the cause of it.
/Actually, its just a ridiculous set of subs that gets all of reddit worked up. A prime source of drama, by both those for and against them.
so they are actually offended/mad? Its not just a troll type thing getting offended over nothing?
yes they actually are offended over nothing.
If you say "men have penises" they will take offense on behalf of all the transexuals who were born with and still have vaginas but identify as men.
Its happened before.
They genuinely are. Which leads to a bunch of people that follow them way too closely getting offended/mad. Its a viscous circle.
[deleted]
I haven't heard about those examples! Can you link some context? pls and ty
[deleted]
Well i searched for the TofuTofu user and honestly i'm sorry i asked. Looks like your standard PUA nonsense. And i've seen nothing about Danielle Sanhu that leads me to believe she's a radical feminist, or somehow in control of SRS...
I was mostly curious about this bit, which i haven't been able to find anything on.
>There was Reddit post talking about a permanent wave meeting in Brooklyn that kicked a transgendered female out because her "privilege as a male no longer made the meeting a safe space".
Because the Admins agree with them?
We are doing reddit a great favor, shitlord.
sarcasm
Literally saving lives. One comment we disagree with at a time.
-SRS
Yeah, fuck those slacktivists who thinks running a Tumblr is saving the world.
Clearly, yelling into the void of the internet via reddit is the way to go!
:D
My guess is that it's because they brigade in a "good way", in that their brigading makes the less attractive portions of reddit get downvoted or berated into submission. The other side of the coin are your /r/[insert slur]. When they brigade, they make reddit look way worse to any outsiders. So when they brigade and harass other forums, they get chucked.
I'm getting a little conspiratory I guess, but I honestly think SRS brigades are tolerated because despite how insane they are, they effectively smother the uglier aspects of the website.
EDIT: For those downvoting immediately for thinking I'm supporting SRS, take five seconds to actually read what I wrote. For those that are now downvoting because I edited complaining about downvotes... shit, yeah, I probably have that coming.
> they effectively smother the uglier aspects of the website.
But they don't really. They don't change anyone's opinion and they don't even spread their hate and insanity in a sensible way. Any target, at any time, for any reason. There is no thought given to it. Why bother finding out real information when all you have to do is call someone an oppressor to silence them in your own mind?
I don't think SRS is effective at changing anyone's mind about much. But I do think they go in and upvote one another and downvote people with offensive opinions, and that makes reddit look like it's not actually supporting wildly offensive stuff.
Yeah but they make no effort to do so any time the horrible thing reddit says agrees with their ideology. You will never find an SRS post about how somebody on one of their subforums said "Kill all men" and how that is sexist. Nor will you ever find a post about someone who "punched the first white person I see" is a racist. Or even at all a bad person. In fact they will go far out of there way to defend any minority for any reason, even if they are doing something they generally disapprove of.
I just think that their efforts are so disparate and fractured that they produce no real effect.
That's what I mean though. Nobody gets up in arms about anti white dude stuff. This website won't make national news by beligerantly screaming about the patriarchy. It's the marketably offensive stuff that makes reddit look bad. And while they're usually angry and derailing and stupid about it, those are some parts of reddit they target.
I don't want to come off as pro-SRS, because I hate that sub almost as much as TRP. I just think their brigades are much more tolerable from a PR standpoint.
Yeah you're definitely right about that. The issue at the heart of this is that it is too easy a story to write negatively if reddit bans them.
"Reddit bans bastion of tolerance and civil rights, allows (whatever offensive subs you want to put here) to remain".
And because any time the admins take even the smallest step towards banning SRS, they'll receive a horrific backlash from media sites about endorsing the racism and sexism and other isms that SRS claims to be against.
Anderson Cooper would have a field day.
That's more or less what I'm saying. Their brigades are allowed for PR reasons.
Gawker is a fucking scourge upon the internet.
See, this is the problem. I wouldn't mind SRS actually did focus on some of the shittier aspects of Reddit, what with so much cancer being on the default subs.
However, it's essentially just "this guy said something bad about feminism, ARM THE DILDOS". It's less "focusing on shitty people" and more "stop liking what I don't like". Not to mention that they aren't even trying to not be a brigade.
I'm not endorsing what they do. They're often annoying and wrong. I just think that's the general rationale for letting them get away with it while other more unsavory subs get crushed for it immediately.
Hooray, someone posts that South Park bit and exactly what you'd expect to happen happens.
I feel like we've seen this before.
But they are totally not a brigade.
You've really got to think that if /r/ShitRedditSays is banned, then SRD won't be far behind it. SRD still has noticeable vote patterns with plenty of popcorn pissers and .np can easily be disabled quickly with a checkbox to the right, plus SRS has now made a very similar post to what /u/MillenniumFalc0n had made addressing brigading.
SRS is a brigade and so is every other meta sub.
Nope. SRD will switch to screenshots only if SRS gets banned. I don't think SRS is going to circlejerk over screenshots (it would gradually lose popularity) while SRD can perfectly continue being a drama sub without meta-linking.
Why do you think SRS would lose popularity and SRD would be perfectly fine? Why would SRS be banned first and SRD be given a chance to be improved? All meta subs are brigades: The admins should change their policy towards them or get rid of them altogether.
Part of the SRS subscriber base actually want to get rid off what they perceive are bad aspects to reddit (casual racism, rape jokes, etc.). If their efforts don't have an impact anymore (no more pissed of redditors, no more downvoted bigotry ) they will walk away from it completely. These are the people that go on Twitter and try to ruin other peoples lives if they said something racist/misogynist in the media, they want to be active and shouting at screenshots won't satisfy their needs.
SRDers haven't got anything invested in this sub, there's no underlying ideology, people subscribe here for fun. I even believe there's a chance that the quality of posting will improve because mods or users won't be able to delete the comments once the drama's posted. How many times do you see /r/cringe threads being nuked when linked to SRD for example?
ShitRedditSays is basically to circlejerk about shit redditors say, or at least that is my impression. I believe that they would still be able to circlejerk about how terrible redditors are through screenshots.
Why does underlying ideology really matter here, especially when SRS's underlying ideology is beneficial to the image of the site? And believe it or not, SRDers have their own beliefs and will circlejerk about certain things (ie. how much SRS sucks), this is why SRD always puts out a unified voting front, if we didn't have something invested in this then np wouldn't be needed.
Edit for clarification: I'm saying that SRS is a circlejerk as in a "positive feedback loop that can occur when ideas and beliefs are reinforced within a group or subculture’s enclosed space."
SRS hails itself as a circlejerk (specifically what it calls itself) and I thought that wasn't a debatable issue...
> ShitRedditSays is basically to circlejerk
It isn't. A "circlekjerk" isn't what you seem to think it is. go to /r/circlejerk and see. What they do there is a circlejerk. Constantly joking about things that aren't their real opinions to create satire.
SRS does not do that. SRS seriously believes and attempts to enforce their "circlejerk" ideas onto the rest of reddit. By the simple fact that they are being ideologically honest they are not a circlejerk.
A circlejerk is a hivemind without self-awareness. they rarely involve satire outside of r/circlejerk, which requires self awareness.
interestingly, one hallmark of a circlejerk is silencing dissenting opinions. (through downvotes)
This is a good writeup of what a circlejerk is.
I mean you're just wrong though. And a circlebroker link? You can fuck right off with trying to have something defined by the people trying to destroy it. It is so weird how in the post, all types of SRS jerking aren't so bad, and all types of /r/circlejerk jerking are terrible and destructive.
Circlejerks aren't all satirical. Look at /r/atheism.
I'm pretty sure you have no idea what a circlejerk is.
Well since it is defined by the actions of /r/cirlejerk - yeah I think I do. Go read that subreddit, then read SRS, and show me an similarity between the two if you'd like. Or make any effort to prove your point in another way.
When someone uses the world "circlejerk" on reddit, they are refering to a specific thing and style of satire. One that SRS categorically does not participate in because they seriously believe their ideology.
You are very misinformed...
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/circle-jerk
>ShitRedditSays is basically to circlejerk about shit redditors say
Boy do they love them some brigading though...
>Why does underlying ideology really matter here, especially when SRS's underlying ideology is beneficial to the image of the site?
I've found that the only people who give any kind of real fuck about the image of Reddit are SRSers themselves, which is richly ironic.
Well you know the goddamn people who own the site care about it's image too.
Hence why SRS will never be banned for blatantly brigading.
Yes and I do think that they should be banned if the admins will ban for brigading as should SRD and the rest of the meta subs.
All I'm for is an even application of the rules.
I don't think they should be banned. I just wish they and the admins would admit that we are all brigades. I think the massive amounts of commenting in linked threads is just as damaging as voting and SRS encourages its users to engage. "Don't touch the poop, just yell at it."
Yeah, they should definitely change their policy on commenting.
I don't care if they change it or leave it, I just want it clearly defined and evenly applied.
You have a point. At least SRD makes some effort with the .np and takes actions against obvious popcorn pissers.
SRS mod /u/ArchangelleJophiele on voting in links threads: "also if we catch u doing it we will ban u. no exceptions."
It seems that they are doing something.
Not quite.
That only goes for votes, not making comments. They have plenty of tools in place to monitor vote totals.
Yet, they ban more people from their own sub than those brigading others.
How do you know who they ban? Do you have access to that?
You'd get some posts on SRD and elsewhere about it. SRD does make such actions public knowledge.
Never once heard of SRS banning anyone for brigading after being active on this site for 4.5 years.
http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/1m9kz3/onthetopicofchildpornographydecriminalize/cc72txk
This person wasn't banned even though they posted a screenshot showing they voted. ಠ_ಠ
Probably because they were chastised because of it, corrected their mistake and moved on.
I know that the SRD mods have known to be lenient and let people off of bans from popcorn pissing.
Good point. I cede to your previous statement.
How many people have they banned for it then?
What, did the admins let them see what users voted? Because otherwise that's just a load of bullshit.
I could actually deal with this getting deleted if we get rid of SRS in exchange.
Now that's what I like to hear! Apply the rules evenly!
According to intortus, what they do is 'organic' so it's not against the rules.
What the frak does that even mean? My apple is organic, but if I whip it at my coworker and hit them in the head, I'm pretty sure that's against the rules.
If not, I'll totally throw it at him though.
Intortus probably uses that word because he thinks rape jokes, 'racist' humor, etc is undesirable for this website. Mods and admins don't like to have to deal with pissed off people anyway because someone said a naughty word or made a 'bad' joke.
Also you usually don't see SRS linking to a two day old thread, no it's always a couple of hours old, so the voting traffic is masked.
Actually seen them doing it a bit more blatantly lately. Hitting up 2 day old comments.
As a person who does not read or post on SRS but generally agrees that that South Park joke is stupid and offensive and not an excuse for using that word, how is everyone so sure that this is an "SRS brigade"? I mean, it doesn't seem that weird to me that a big portion of Reddit might just think that that joke is tasteless...
I ran a script that tags SRS's. It's so-so accurate, as not everyone who posts there is really an SRS'er. However, it works wonders when you go into a linked thread and see it light with fuchsia tags.
http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/1nfqeb/dontbeafag15dontbeahomophobe_27/
Not to mention, as funny as South Park can be at times, they're not just gonna be able change the way the entire world feels about the term "fag" overnight. It just doesn't work that way.
Why are they still allowed to do this?
Because the only way to stop them from doing it would be to ban the SRS Subreddits, and if they do that then the online media backlash from websites no one truly cares about except for said SRSters would have a field day...so the Reddit Admins that aren't SRSters are scared and the ones that are sit there and laugh as they watch SRS slowly take over this entire website in terms of policing what people can and cannot say.
Fuck SRS.
Fuck SRS
Ehh, I find them funny.
Funny in a "Jesus Christ, why do you take Reddit so seriously?" kind of way though. If SRS went away this site would become a lot less funny for me.
I can identify with that, I've had comments at the top of SRS, and still get +500upvotes. Boy I just love rustling their jimmies.
The braveness is off the charts, someone get me some sedative!
Because the site looks better in the public eye when racism/homophobia/misogyny/whatever is heavily downvoted and criticized. After the whole jailbait fiasco I'm pretty sure the admins are doing whatever they can to not seem like a haven for bigots and pedophiles, and SRS voluntarily helps that cause.
> SRS voluntarily helps that cause.
How?
By brigading...
No, SRS just sits and cries about things they think are mean and then tells people they're bad for making jokes
Well, they are still a self-proclaimed circlejerk. They're certainly not the pure morality warriors of Reddit. I'm just saying there's a reason why /r/niggers is no longer a thing but /r/shitredditsays is.
What SRSers are there ?
ummmdude, ummmdude, ThirdWaveSTEMinism, stickmaleboy, ChaseTheBear etc . . . I should update my tags and see who else pops
edit: FeedMyEgo, deathpigeonx
These are just the users that don't use alts.
The second one (cummmdude) doesn't work.
lol, must have been a Freudian slip. It's ummmdude.
Now you have "ummmdude" two times.
Totally didn't brigade. /sarcasm/
Everyone sure is having fun and enjoying a well reasoned polite discussion since SRS showed up . . . said no one ever.
Also, it's weird that South Park is praised like crazy around here but whenever the fag joke is mentioned suddenly Reddit turns into tumblr and decides to get offended at everything.
I wouldn't say that's an accurate observation, it's like half and half, one side is like "nah it's ok to say fag, if you get offended then you're just a bitch" and the other half are like "no, straight people on TV don't get to decide that, it's a nasty word"
It depends a lot on the subreddit, I think. In the defaults it is skewed much more toward the former. The majority response there is extremely angry and defensive if anyone dares to question their casual use of that word.
It's also weird how Reddit protects gay rights but hate black people too.
I would have never imagine this a couple of years ago.
Eh, not always. Mention gay pride parade anywhere on this site and see how redditors react.
They support LGBT people but they get mad at them for not conforming to "normal". Actually this is exactly how swaths of this site feel about any number of visible, sexual, or religious minorities.
This site is fucking weird.
It's almost as if Reddit is a community of millions of different people, all with differentiating opinions.
but the strangest part is that their opinions are all the same.
the hivemind on this site scares me but i cant stop looking at it
Not really, it's a pretty common thing. They're in favor of women's lib, gay rights, you-name-it progressive cause provided that cause asks absolutely nothing from them from except lip service. You see it a lot of places and it's this general desire to look like a "good person" but when you have to put your money where your mouth is, even in the smallest, tiniest way, you get people who abandon it entirely.
You can get away with a lot here if you use the right combination of profanity and pop culture references.
It's like supporting freedom of religion but still criticizing the religions themselves.
Oh, lets not forget Reddit's seeming phobia of transgender people.
Let's not forget the T in LGBT, huh?
Are you being serious? People circlejerk over assumed transphobia all the time. If anyone asks a question about transgender people, or shows the least bit of discomfort, they are accused of hating transgender people.
It's easy, the hivemind is only in support of it when they don't actually have to do anything.
Gay rights? sure sure go ahead
I should not be a dick to gays for my own amusement? HITLERPRESSION!
Ah yes, the ol' "Allies" redefine the word faggot jerk.
I don't get it. You hurled that slur when you were ten years old and then wonder why gay people get so mad about using it now like it means nothing. You traumatized the gay kids, and then at the high school reunion you try to act like enlightened people are retaking it. Go fuck yourself, it is still a pejorative, it's not your word to reinvent.
Here we have tangible evidence that SRS invades and brigades. Where are the admins? While I certainly think it shines Reddit up that /r/niggers is gone, we need to enforce the same rules to other hate groups. /r/niggers was banned for invading. SRS should be, too - and the rest of their subs.
SRS even has a meta-post at the top of their sub to tell people not to invade so much. And it's not like they contribute when they're invading - it's just a variation over "go play in traffic", "did your menzfeel get hurt?" and "lol i dont even, dont real".
Why are the admins accepting this? Only a matter of time before the media catches on and exposes the nature of their doxxing and cyberbullying (Amanda Todd, anyone?), just like the media caught on with the pedos and those creeps that took pictures of girls.
EDIT: SRSMythos is now following this comment. And in a moment of almost unbelievable stupidity, the OP of the SRSMythos post admits to invading the thread that this thread is about. Here's the link.
You can try to message them about it /r/reddit.com if you're lucky and they're not busy playing TF2 you will probably get a silly excuse, but I'm honestly convinced they will just ignore you.
EDIT: I'll add the SRSMythos link to my post in SRSsucks!
Admins messaged. I feel confident they'll take the appropriate action against /r/ShitRedditSays - they've already established what happens to subs that work like this with /r/niggers.
Full disclosure, SRS pisses me off to no end - I think they're extremely damaging to the LGBT cause and they are the reason I no longer support that common 'grouping' of us in LGBT. I simply didn't know the lesbian culture carried such hate for the surrounding society and I do not want to partake in alienating the straight community from gay men at least. I don't want to be associated with hate groups like that, nor do I want them to "protect" me from people calling me a faggot or whatever.
> I think they're extremely damaging to the LGBT cause
Agreed. But I don't think it's the [L] letter that's causing [T]rouble.
Well keep us updated on their reply then!
Despite what we all know, we don't really have "tangible evidence", and certainly not proof. The only ones who really know where votes come from are the admins, and they are pretty quiet about SRS and brigading, with one notable exception. They have investigated in the past, and they will probably investigate in the future, but only if it benefits them.
> /r/niggers[1] is gone, we need to enforce the same rules to other hate groups.
Why do you consider srs a 'hate group' on par with /r/niggers?
Where is there evidence of brigading? "Invading" is allowed in the regard that people are allowed to enter threads and argue or "yell at the poop", just not vote on linked to comments. How is SRS a hate group? The meta-post says not to brigade, not that people can't comment.
Edit DOWNVOTES! WHAT IS THIS SOME KIND OF BRIGADE? SOMEONE MESSAGE THE MODS AND INFORM THAT SRD IS A HATE GROUP. THE MASS MEDIA WILL EXPOSE SRD FOR THE CYBERBULLYING, SHIT-STIRRING SINKHOLE THAT IT IS! lol
>How is SRS a hate group?
..
>Hey now, upvotes and downvotes are clearly a legit peer review process. It just so happens their peers are shitlords, but the method is sound.
...
>Who gives a shit.
>>Non-shitlords, that's who.
...
>I am simply aghast, and I cannot put into words how completely out of control these shitlords are. The entire fucking universe absolutely must bend to their will, or else fuck you and everything you live for.
>"Fuck everything you care about, fuck your feelings, fuck your personality, fuck your thoughts, fuck you, this shit isn't about me so fuck you, fucker."
>I hope they're all engulfed in flames, so I can say: Who gives a shit?
...
> Do they really think gross creepy neckbeards are entitled to the exact same treatment by people?
Also, just so you can treat this as beardtearz/manhurt/whatever you want to call it, so you can dismiss my post from your mind:
Straight white dude from Scandinavia.
In all seriousness can someone please show me evidence of brigading, and explain how SRS is a hate group?
what evidence for brigading are you looking for? the fact that every time a comment is linked in SRS the number of downvotes it receives skyrockets, and a number of ppl pop in from SRS to 'argue'?
if you look at the comments by SRS people in that thread, quite a lot of them are in the negative. It's varied between positive and negative scores in terms of SRS comments, and the comment that SRS linked to in this case has a positive score. The main guy who objected to the joke also posted in SRSsucks that he's not from SRS. There really isn't an SRS conspiracy to downvote everyone.
lol, you're allowed to comment in the thread, just not vote. It's not particularly stupid, there are just some subs where you can't link to threads you've already commented in, and I wasn't sure if that was the case with SRSMythos, so I said I'd already commented, and if that's not allowed for that sub, I'd delete either my comment or my post. Also, someone could just look at the Mythos post, look in this thread, and see I've commented in both. You're not the detective investigator you think you are pal.
I don't mind the downvotes, but I'd be interested to know why? Am I missing something? In all seriousness please inform me if I'm done something wrong and I'll try and address it.
SRS isn't doing what Brian Boitano would do.
70 comments in this post in an hour? Odd.
Get the butter, I smell meta popcorn.
Hundred now! Must be some of that "organic growth" /u/intortus was talking about.
155 now
Where are they all coming from? Am going to bed right now (its midnight) I can't wait to see how it looks like 6 hours from now
Sad how upset people get over this sort of stuff. Some people need to seriously get a life. ^^^^I ^^^^say ^^^^this ^^^^while ^^^^on ^^^^reddit ^^^^all ^^^^day
Jesus christ...
This is just my opinion, but I think reddit gets its panties way too knotted up whenever someone says "fag" or "faggot".
A while back I was reading through the post history of a guy who was rude to me and noticed he said "Nigger" A LOT. I also noticed that he called a guy, "A fucking homophobic piece of shit" and told the guy to go kill himself because he typed the word, "Fag."
Some people..
Inconsistency is the only consistent thing around here.
Shit, I've seen an SRD frequent poster say that it is always homophobic to say fag and then use the age old "OP is a fag" joke and then defend it's use because he was friends with the OP so that makes it ok.
"It's different when I do it!"
That's really not the case, every day I see tens of posts with thousands of upvotes calling people a "faggot"
Seriously wtf is this guy talking about? "OP is a fag/wasn't a fag" is still upvoted a huge amount.
It depends. I've seen uses of the word "faggot" get upvotes into the thousands but I've also seen it downvoted into the hundreds.
Reddit is weird sometimes.
It's almost like posting it at different times, in different places, or in different contexts exposes it do different people and gets different results.
It's almost as if it isn't some amorphous blob that is only either a neckbeard-fedora-wearing-shitlord or le brave SRSter, but made up of millions of different people from around the world.
> This is just my opinion, but I think reddit gets its panties way too knotted up whenever someone says "fag" or "faggot".
Agreed. I mean, sure I can see why it's bad and comes with a bunch of negative and offensive connotations... but at the end of the day it's a three letter word that some stranger has said on the Internet. If you're gonna get riled up over anything, that should not be it.
Seems to me like the people defending it tend to get a lot more worked up than the people arguing it isn't acceptable, at least judging by the amount of insults and general vitriol in their respective comments.
It works the other way, too. Some people just don't make sense.
SnapShots: 1, 2, 3, ^Readability
SnapShot
(Mirror | open source | create your own snapshots)
Wow. There is >200 child comments between the two chains.
This thread is just exceptionally out there in terms of SRS conspiracy theorists.
The Redditbot snapshot showed that that post had -14 but now it's at 27.
But oops! Time for "SRS is a brigade" circlejerk when SRD aren't any better. Pot calling kettle black again. Now watch as I get downvoted for noting this out.
OP confirmed for butthurt MRA and total douchebag.
I have literally not once posted to /r/MensRights and I presented the title as neutrally as possible, what the fuck's your problem?
AS of posting that post has 35 upvotes, but I'm almost positive SRS upvoted it to make Reddit look bad.
http://redditlog.com/snapshot/21082/26859
Did you know? If "fag" doesn't get enough upvotes, SRS is a brigade!
≈≈≈≈≈★
Wow you're still around?
Just for the curious this is the kind of position this thing genuinely holds. 'Reddit normalizes rape"
Textbook mental deficiency.
>Inflammatory Juggernaut
Wow, this belongs in /r/cringe.
Redditor for a year... ~500 karma... ~1 comment a day.... You are the strangest reddit account ever.
I don't like to post much, read-only almost all time. This is my one and only acc, no smurfs or smth.
Thats exactly what I figured. I am just surprised by your restraint :P Most people fall down the rabbit hole pretty dam hard.
To be fair, you are the one who used the word rape.
> sex without consent.
Whats that called in a single word?