An OP in /r/outoftheloop asks why 'Flappy Bird' was taken off the market, then refuses to accept the answer as to why. Posters react. (np.reddit.com)

SubredditDrama

39 ups - 16 downs = 23 votes

34 comments submitted at 02:18:22 on Feb 12, 2014 by snallygaster

  • [-]
  • deepit6431
  • 11 Points
  • 03:23:28, 12 February

And this is how creationism is still prevalent.

  • [-]
  • EdgarAllanNope
  • 4 Points
  • 06:05:53, 12 February

/r/circlejerk

/r/magicskyfairy

  • [-]
  • deepit6431
  • 7 Points
  • 06:11:58, 12 February

No, but this is legitimately how creationism is still prevalent. I'm not being euphoric here, I'm talking about the "no all the facts you just showed me are wrong because I feel they're wrong* attitude.

  • [-]
  • Baxiepie
  • 3 Points
  • 12:05:30, 12 February

I think you kinda are. Why else would you shoehorn "lol, religious people are dumb" into a conversation where it's in no way shape or form relevant.

  • [-]
  • deepit6431
  • 2 Points
  • 12:09:40, 12 February

"creationism lol" does not equate to "religious people lol"

  • [-]
  • Baxiepie
  • 0 Points
  • 12:16:53, 12 February

I'm sorry. I haven't personally met nonreligious creationists myself. Could you point me to the creationists you were mocking that believe it for a reason OTHER than its a core teaching of their religion?

  • [-]
  • deepit6431
  • 3 Points
  • 12:20:34, 12 February

Sigh.

All creationists are religious, but not all religious people are creationists.

I was mocking creationists, not all religious people.

  • [-]
  • Baxiepie
  • 0 Points
  • 12:27:46, 12 February

You were doing it in a discussion about Flappy Bird. Do you not see how you ranting about metaphysical opinions in a discussion where it's completely irrelevant comes off as more than a bit euphoric?

  • [-]
  • sodapop_incest
  • 1 Points
  • 15:36:02, 12 February

TIL one sentence=rant

  • [-]
  • Baxiepie
  • 1 Points
  • 15:42:25, 12 February

Your right :D. Playing at semantics makes his post TOTALLY relevant to Flappy Bird

More Comments - Click Here

  • [-]
  • DisgruntledBerserker
  • 1 Points
  • 16:00:07, 12 February

I spent four years learning and studying paleontology. Creationism is always relevant to me. I'm sorry it isn't to you, but if something that is interesting to me that I comment on isn't relevant to your immediate life, feel free to fuck right off. The rest of us aren't here to cater to you, chief.

  • [-]
  • Baxiepie
  • 1 Points
  • 16:11:22, 12 February

Relevant to you =/= relevant to a discussion about Flappy Bird. wanting to go off on a self righteous tangent at the drop of a fedora on any and every thread they find is why Bravetheists get such a bad rep.

  • [-]
  • EdgarAllanNope
  • -1 Points
  • 06:26:40, 12 February

Please go on. I would like to see how that's the reason creationism is still prevalent.

  • [-]
  • austin101123
  • 3 Points
  • 06:36:47, 12 February

Watch the Ken Ham debate, and think about it.

  • [-]
  • EdgarAllanNope
  • -1 Points
  • 06:45:37, 12 February

I don't know. I don't think science and creationism are mutually exclusive. I believe the Vatican agrees.

  • [-]
  • Helepolis305
  • 4 Points
  • 06:54:30, 12 February

But science and YEC are. And adding god to evolution is just a "god of the gaps" style argument. It doesn't add any value