User gets angry when mod of /r/thebluepill says he would ban users for threatening bodily harm (np.reddit.com)
SubredditDrama
63 ups - 21 downs = 42 votes
183 comments submitted at 18:11:44 on Jan 22, 2014 by blazerz
User gets angry when mod of /r/thebluepill says he would ban users for threatening bodily harm (np.reddit.com)
SubredditDrama
63 ups - 21 downs = 42 votes
183 comments submitted at 18:11:44 on Jan 22, 2014 by blazerz
He was just a bundle of fun in modmail, too!
That's the thing I love about parody subs/pisstake subs. You guys just get to act like a dick because you dont' have to be fully serious.
that was my favorite part of being a circlejerk mod, being an absolute asshole to people in modmail
It seems like a good life goal- utter leeway to be an asshat.
Let me show you how little I care about being banned from your subreddit by messaging you about it, and then continuing the "conversation" by responding more times over the course of an hour.
Nope, not mad.
I picture that dude sitting behind his computer repeatedly telling himself he's not mad but a throbbing vein on his forehead is suggesting otherwise, mumbling to himself "yeah that showed them" every time he clicks the submit button.
Why isn't he sharing his map for his next series? Is he too beta to take constructive criticism?
We want maps.
idk but i dont think we'll ever see, poor bastard is shadowbanned
This is the 4th time in a couple of weeks I've seen necron_overlord featured here. It's kinda impressive in a way.
links pls
OMG I wanna c!!!!!!
I could only find two.
Here he debates gender and bathroom signs
And here he gets mad over afro candy sold in Japan
What the hell they have 70 mods?
/r/badphilosophy has 200+ mods and about ~3,000 subs, and I think this is the lowest mod/sub ratio since the subs creation.
/r/modeveryone has +1000
That sub actually has more mods than subscribers... impressive.
That's actually not that hard to accomplish really
I've noticed that with a lot of SRS subs too - is there some sort of secret club hidden in modmail?
There's like a whole stratum of super-secret private meta subs and modmail jerks. It's like the masons, but instead of secret handshakes there's ascii art, and instead of ancient hermetic secrets there's pictures of power moderator's cats.
Also le most indie of musics.
> is there some sort of secret club hidden in modmail?
p much. We kinda just chill in mod mail and use it like a massive group PM system. Sometimes we get to ban people and have a guest star for the day.
Oddly, we don't actually discuss the sub or its topic in most subs. Just kinda bullshit about whatever the topic is.
That said, it's no an 'SRS thing', the CJ/CB subs do this also. It's more of a mod thing.
Fair enough, I just noticed a lot of SRS-run subs seemed to have these disproportionately large mod teams. There's nothing wrong with that, just an observation.
Dude, our modmail jerks are the best thing EVAR.
ptss us mere members feel left out!
I HOPE UR RDY
http://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/1vv93k/usergetsangrywhenmodofrthebluepillsayshe/cew9rua
Hahahaha that was great <3
We're leaking a thing. BE RDY!
I count 69 (giggity). But yeah that's nearly 1 mod for every 100 subs. Probably a bit excessive.
not much drama really - just a dickish user who didn't last long.
I always love when people are like "WELL JUST BAN ME THEN"
Like yeah sure we'll do that. Did you expect anything different?
There was a guy in my LoL match yesterday who was all like "I'm going afk unleas you guys let me get a penta". And everyone on the team was like, "fine, then go". And he was like "I'm serious! I'm totally serious!"
Long story short, he eventually shut up and played when he realised nobody gave a shit about him not being there.
Exactly. It's just attention seeking and easily dealt with
SnapShots: 1, 2, ^Readability
SnapShot
(Mirror | open source | create your own snapshots)
looking down at this thread:
5thLawof_Robotics comment score below threshold (70 children)
lol
>Our official stance, as mods, has always been that there is no official stance. This is not the fempire and it will not be run with ridiculously strenuous rules. We each mod on a case by case basis for what we feel is appropriate in context and I'm not going to have people making threats to the personal safety or well being of other users.
Oh that's hilarious.
We're not going to have strict rules, just arbitrary ones that are enforced with religious vigor according to the opinions of 70+ different people, most of whom happen to be from SRS.
/r/circlejerk seems to be run about the same way. It's doing fine.
Our rule is basically "Don't be a complete asshole". And we're quite lax about things. As long as you aren't rabidly racist/sexist/violent/assholish, we just let the community decide what they like with upvotes and downvotes. Jesus you mad.
Since when is banning someone for violent threats "religious vigor" rather than absolutely normal modding?
> As long as you aren't rabidly racist/sexist/violent/assholish
You realize that's blatantly subjective right?
Sexism to some is "I disagree with the notion that women earn 70 cents on the dollar".
>Jesus you mad.
I'm curious, why is this the go-to response for your types? I indicated in no way that I was mad. I made fun of the person I quoted and left it at that.
Do you feel like implying that everyone who calmly disagrees with you is some frothing rageaholic somehow negates the points they were making?
We've had discussions of the wage gap in TBP actually, no one was banned over them.
If you're not a redpiller, you basically have to be a redpill level bigot to get banned, and if you are a redpiller, then you basically have to do what this guy did to get banned, or be boring.
> If you're not a redpiller, you basically have to be a redpill level bigot to get banned, and if you are a redpiller, then you basically have to do what this guy did to get banned, or be boring.
Or run afoul of any of the 70+ mods who are banning people based on whatever criteria they choose according to the quote I posted here.
I am a mod there, so you'll have to take my word for it that that is generally how we operate.
Also, probably only about half of those mods actually actively moderate the sub.
> I am a mod there, so you'll have to take my word for it that that is generally how we operate.
You know I'm not going to take your word on this. In everyone's own mind they're always a hero.
The system described here though is one where 70 or more people get to each individually decide what constitutes a ban and act unilaterally and with no system of checks.
If you can figure out a way to keep that many people honest and unbiased and fair in the absence of anything requiring them to do so congrats, you have undergone the most significant social engineering project in human history.
I didn't really expect you to.
You're really trying to make an issue out of nothing. It's like 65% sad and 35% hilarious.
I'm not really making any sort of an issue. I laughed at the linked comments (in SRD?!?!? GASP!) and then replied to the blue pill folks brigading this thread.
You have almost 14 posts in this thread alone. You look crazed and it's most certainly an issue for you to spend this much time on it.
Please calm down or we will have to ask you to take your outbursts elsewhere.
Ahahahahahahaah!
>Sexism to some is "I disagree with the notion that women earn 70 cents on the dollar".
No one would call that rabid.
U seem mad tho. Especially re: SRS. And re: These people in a sub I never go to mod in a way I don't 100% like. And re: banning someone from said sub you never go to over actual death threats. HOW DARE WE? The injustice of it all.
;_; did we thaw ur peeches?
> No one would call that rabid.
That isn't true.
Actually that bit of "sexism" got me banned from r/feminism.
>U seem mad tho
Not really. Actually that's just a sad attempt on your part to derail because you don't know how to argue like an adult (hence all the tumblr-speak).
Why didn't you respond with a death threat? Are you only defending that in the abstract? Put your money where your mouth is.
They're such assholes for rebuking a death threat. Show 'em, show 'em good.
> Why didn't you respond with a death threat? Are you only defending that in the abstract? Put your money where your mouth is.
Be honest, did this make sense in your head even a little bit?
Because out in writing like this it's pure gibberish.
I dunno it works like that in real life. Internet moderation shouldn't be that hard.
It's really weird that you consider removal of explicit threats of violence to be "arbitrary".
No, the fact that it was left to the whims of the various mods to do whatever they feel is best rather than adhering to any sort of established set of rules is what makes it arbitrary.
Which is kind of the definition of the word "abitrary".
Pst the established rule is "no death threats."
You do realize all subreddit mod rules are arbitrary? There is NO rule of law here. If our actual users had a problem with it, we'd consider hard and fast rules. But they're fine with "don't be dicks, folks".
> You do realize all subreddit mod rules are arbitrary? There is NO rule of law here. If our actual users had a problem with it, we'd consider hard and fast rules. But they're fine with "don't be dicks, folks".
You do realize that isn't the case right?
Many subs have very clear rules other than "don't piss off the mods".
They list them out in the sidebar for all to see.
That is the opposite of arbitrary.
> We're not going to have strict rules, just arbitrary ones that are enforced with religious vigor according to the opinions of 70+ different people, most of whom happen to be from SRS.
If it quacks like a duck...
Yeah, TBP acts too much like SRS for my tastes. I mean, they're without question on the right side compared to TRP, but that subreddit is so circlejerky. It's like most other subreddits devoted to the lack of something (/r/atheism, /r/childfree, /r/antisrs/srssucks, etc.)
It is a circlejerk. A circlejerk that makes fun of TRP.
I just don't enjoy circlejerks even if I support their side. Preferences I guess, but it is a good sub for finding the batshit crazy stuff TRP says.
ok so dont go to the sub..?
I don't. I was just stating my preferences. Obviously that's not working out for me so I'll shut up now haha
oh okay fair enough.
Some days bluepill is a bit much for me because even though its making fun of TRP its still really depressing seeing the stupid shit redpillers say.
It'd be nice if they could stay out of this sub.
Or be a tad less obvious in their brigading.
Because as we all know you can only browse a single subreddit at a time. It's totally not possible at all for me to be a member of the blue pill and SRD simultaneously, no, the two are diametrically opposed.
Also obviously everyone has only ONE metareddit and it's not like metasub users have massive crossover or anything.
No no, the massive shift in votes following a bunch of bluepillers arriving is a totally organic process.
...or they're subbed to both places and its only now showing on their frontpages? Not everything is a brigade
> Not everything is a brigade
I never claimed "everything" was.
But this brigade is a brigade.
I mean if that's how you feel the need to spend your time go for it. But it's kind of sad.
/Even your mods recognize that you guys have a problem with brigading..
/is it so hard to keep to your own circlejerk?
More Comments - Click Here
You're just being a big old crybaby because no one likes what you have to say. It's not a conspiracy, it's just that no one gives a shit about your contrarianism. It should not be surprising to you that people who sit in a meta satire sub would subscribe to other meta subs.
> It's not a conspiracy
How is accusing your sub of brigading a conspiracy when your own mods recognize that it's a major problem that you guys can't seem to control?
Yes, some really crazy conspiracy theory nonsense there, that people who are known to brigade might be brigading on a thread where their brigading is being discussed.
Total 9/11 truther stuff there.
More Comments - Click Here
99% of us are SRD users and have been for ages.
You're a regular in fucking /r/subredditdrama, the smuggest circlejerk of them all!
SRD isn't a circlejerk. People argue in the comments here all the time. The fact that you disagree with me is proof of that.
Oh but it is. Disagreement doesn't imply everything. /r/atheism had the biggest drama fests but I think we agree it was a giant circlejerk.
Here in /r/subredditdrama, we all feel smug and act condescending towards the subreddit linked in question while we repeat the same discussion they were having. And when everything fails, it's either "and nothing of value was lost" or "omg why do people care about x because it's so obvious it's y!".
Well that last argument is kind of repetitive but laughing at /r/cringe and making a point about how racist /r/conspiracy is really is a circlejerk here, just to give some examples.
I define a circlejerk as a group of people who have the same opinion and then glorify themselves for it. /r/politics and /r/atheism are circlejerks because they all have the same liberal/atheist viewpoint and then congratulate themselves because of it. Dissenting viewpoints are not allowed, you never even see them in the comments because they're automatically downvoted to the bottom. Smugness is a vital ingredient for a circlejerk, but if you have a group of people arguing with each other I don't see how you can compare that to a group of dudes jacking each other off.
On SRD we actually have discussion. There's disagreement but as long as you can articulate a good case you're usually welcome. Yeah, we "circlejerk" that TRP and /r/conspiracy are terrible places but most normal humans would. Would you say that Obama was "circlejerking" on Monday because he though MLK was a good guy and racism was bad?
That's /r/theredpillcirclejerk as well, without the ahem strange moderation
Edit: woah I guess any other sub but TBP is bad
What is strange about removing a death threat made by a redpiller?
Strange as in not set moderation. Everyone has different rules
Not really. We've all basically agreed on "don't be an asshole except to terpers, and even then within reasonable limits". The implementation of that rule is generally left up to mod discretion, but we're all fairly lax in moderating comments.
Well, and as OffensiveUser says, there's a bit of leeway given, actually, to terpers that want to be assholes: if they're violating the First Rule of Holes ("Stop digging") and providing something for everyone else to laugh at, and aren't doing it in too awful a way, then that's probably all right.
And OMG yeah that's subjective! The horror!
I dunno. As a mod of ainbow, and also talking to the mods of lgbt, it seems to me that there literally is no way to have objective moderation while also trying to prevent people from being assholes. You can't do it. That's always going to be subjective and there's always going to be the possibility of bias, and (especially) room for accusations of it.
Agreed, but I was talking about moderation of non-terpers. We let terpers get away with a lot as long as they aren't boring or annoying.
Gotcha. I guess, then, clarification for anyone else reading the thread who isn't as familiar with the subreddit. :)
Lol I remember when I banned phantom and Occam for being boring...... Good times!
And in any sub which attempts completely objective moderation, simple rules will always lead to barrack room lawyers who'll make it their mission to troll by finding loopholes and kick up a shit-storm if they're banned anyway, and complex rules will just simply not be read by anyone, making them worse than useless. And people will still try to wheedle round them. The net saving in drama is zero. If somehow someone waved a magic wand and made it so everyone on reddit was participating with various subs in good faith, then it would be a hell of a lot easier, but that obviously ain't the case.
>not set moderation
I'd rather have everyone enforcing their own rules which basically boil down to "don't be a asshole" or for pillocks "don't be a boring asshole" than have clear rules written down only to have to tediously argue about them with pillocks (those fuckers love petty arguments).
I'd prefer a sub with an actual community, people post comments in /r/TheBluePill
Don't let /u/BluePillschool hear you say that! :O
He (edit: or she, apparently) swears it is completely different from SRS.
I mean, a large number of the moderators were (or are) moderators of /r/antisrs. Take that however you will, I guess.
uhh... antisrs is controlled by srs. Yes I know this sounds backwards as fuck, but... yeah.
> I know this sounds backwards as fuck
Yes.
Yes it does.
OH MY GOD OH MY GOD HARRIETPOTTER RESPONDED TO ME!
/okay, calm down, calm down, I know she wants to gut you and skin you alive but shes reddit SRS famous, put on your cool face
*Ahem*
You scare the fuck out of me. Like, literally. I know that's probably what you were going for though, so... yeah.
Huh. No, you're wrong actually, that wasn't at all the reaction I was going for. Thanks for validating me though.
OMG I hope this isn't already submitted to SRSMythos
> SRSMythos
I don't know what this is.
Regardless I see today is SRS day on SubredditDrama.
It's our sub for making fun of people who think we're the Illuminati for something. <3
This comment has been linked to in 1 subreddit (at the time of comment generation):
This comment was posted by a bot, see /r/Meta_Bot for more info.
Pretty sure they are a girl?
I don't follow them well enough to know either way.
Didn't he say he was an MRA once? All of my wut.
I don't think he did. I would be shocked if this was true.
It's like moral particularism. They promulgate the rules and give warnings so it isn't a kangaroo court.
Oooh, look at the downvotes.
They're mad.
>judging by some of the things in your comment history, you seem a little... unstable.
Dat tone policing and ableism.
Thought they were against that sort of thing?
IDK, TheBluePill doesn't seem to really go by any safe space rules. There's overlap with feminist communities for the obvious reasons, but there are a lot of non-feminists there, too. I've even seen people agree that, since TRP is being linked, those following TheBluePill should expect to sometimes be triggered.
/r/thebluepill is like the reverse version of /r/tumblrinaction- some people there are heavily involved in SJ, some just like watching idiots be idiots, some people disagree without having a particular agenda, etc.
Basically this. You don't need a particular agenda to make fun of TRP.
Except tumblrinaction makes fun of theredpill too along with SJWs
tumblrinaction apparently used to be a sub where people who agreed with social justice to some degree could make fun of the crazies.
then it got co-opted by people that just straight up hate social justice and now its filled with 'le oh em gee cheque ur privvy m9'
I think that it depends on the thread mostly, I don't go there all that often but it's not all that much different than when it started imo.
hmm okay. Not my thing though.
Fair enough.
>tumblrinaction apparently used to be a sub where people who agreed with social justice to some degree could make fun of the crazies.
>then it got co-opted by people that just straight up hate social justice and now its filled with 'le oh em gee cheque ur privvy m9'
HahahahshsHAHAHAHAHSHAHAHA!
uh huh sure, of course that's why articles about trans* men being mistreated got to the top of the week. That's why theredpillcirclejerk was made, because we hate the SJWs so much. That's why two of our four mods are women. Thats why transphobes who use "trannies" get downvoted to oblivion. That's why our top contributor is trans. That's why a PoC like myself can feel comfortable there.
idk I don't go there but whenever I see it there seems to be a lot of less than great opinions upvoted
also, the constant privilege shitposting tires me. I don't find it funny and it just seems to imply that people there don't think privilege is a real thing.
Well I guess that'suropinion.jpg I get annoyed by TBP as well too (mostly for the way they treated muh Free! posts). To each xirs own
Wait, what posts did you make?
and yeah i dont see the point of /r/theredpillcirclejerk other than 'bluepill is 2SRS4me'
The Blue Pill is not run by the SJW crowd.
Lol, tell that to their mod list.
Hi TBP mod reporting in. Not an SJW. AMA.
Yet.
> The Blue Pill is not run by the SJW crowd.
http://i.imgur.com/6AqKC8T.gif
Yet.
the blue pill isn't SRS so no, we don't enforce that sort of thing.
Only when it's with people they hate. When it's their own kind, it's dog-eat-dog. Just sit back and enjoy the popcorn. Shots of everclear are on me when one of the mods calls someone else either "retarded" or a "cunt."
they specifically said anyone in that sub doing the same thing (going into explicit detail about how they would like to murder another user) would also be banned. They didn't say they ban slurs, they ban death threats.
Well at least the mods are astute enough to recognize what the problem was. It's not them, but the community that needs help.
What do you mean?
Where users on either side call for others' genocide, demean others who don't tow the line, and say some of the most reprehensible drivel that all creates and perpetuates the "Straw feminist" and "straw menz" that we all love and adore. It does jack shit for any sort of progress on GSRM equality, except for a few sore dicks from jerking too hard.
No, no feminists can be as mean as they want, but if other people respond with anything but kindness they're shitlords.
uh they specifically said if anyone in that sub also responded with a death threat that they would be banned as well
I didn't say anything about TBP. My statement was directed at feminism. Apparently "I'd be more inclined to listen you if you weren't such an asshole" is a statement they encounter so much they invented an term to describe the situation. They also consider it fallacy, because "don't be mean to be people" is something they don't think applies to themselves.
We don't tolerate that sort of rhetoric from anyone, regardless of their opinions on feminism.
So it's pretty much "I'll make rules up when I want and feel in the mood."
How is sexting a 7-11 year old satire or circlejerking but wishing somebody a painful death not?
>How is sexting a 7-11 year old satire or circlejerking
I'm sorry, but what are you referring to?
On the side bar. How to pick up chicks.
https://www.7-eleven.com/
It's a convenience store.
Having said that, we have and do allow jokes about terpers pursuing minors because redpillers actually do believe that women start reaching their sexual prime around the age of sixteen.
I think there's a pretty large difference between that (when those jokes are very obviously meant in jest) and the comment made in the linked post, because it was a legitimate death threat directed at a specific user.
When you say "we" I take you are a blue piller. And if you are you broke the only rule I saw there. "Don't vote or comment on stuff that you find linked here." You should be banned from there.
obviously meant in jest and legitimate could be an opinion. Depending on who you are. If somebody said they were going to sext your daughter by using the out line that /r/thebluepill set up. Is that in jest or legitmate?
TBP fights TRP by sinking to their level. It's let's fight immaturity with immaturity attitude is not want is good for fighting for equal rights and respect.
I'm subscribed to /r/subredditdrama and read here fairly regularly.
>obviously meant in jest and legitimate could be an opinion. Depending on who you are. If somebody said they were going to sext your daughter by using the out line that /r/thebluepill[1] set up. Is that in jest or legitmate?
Honestly not sure what you mean? If someone is creeping on a specific user, I would ban them as soon as I found out. The sort of jokes that I was referring to was basically something like this. We absolutely would not allow any content that was actually sexualizing minors (not that that has ever been a problem).
>TBP fights TRP by sinking to their level. It's let's fight immaturity with immaturity attitude is not want is good for fighting for equal rights and respect.
There is no "fight", it's a circlejerk. It's all a joke because TRP doesn't deserve any respectful consideration.
So when it's personal it's not ok but when it's a bunch of people ok.
So in your eyes: What do you call a women two black eyes? Nothing, you already told her twice. Is ok to you but if I said: What do you call canti28 with two black eyes.... That won't be ok because it's personal.
And yes it's a fight. Let's say you are sitting at a table with friends. Somebody at the next table says some shitty stuff. Now you are your friends start saying shitty stuff back. All you are doing is egging on the fight. The only reason TRP is around still is because subs like TBP, SRS and againstmensrights feed them.
TRP is nothing but a bunch of frat boys saying" look at my big dick" and women are feeding of this. During my college days I lived with a lot of frat boys and they all talk like this to eachother. I would say 90% of these guys don't really mean it. They just want to be the alpha in thier group by bullshitting. You know what? they grow out of it. It's the moment of "My dick size doesn't matter, I'm not a lion but a penguin." That's when the boy becomes a man. But with TBP and SRS circlejerking tells these frat boy "They hear me roar and they are scared."
I'm not saying that TBP or SRS is wrong for what they are doing just wrong on how they are doing it. Somebody needs to be the adult at the table.
The punchline of the joke is not that a minor is being sexualized, but that redpillers are gross, creepy assholes for sexualizing minors. It's a satire subreddit, of an extreme, reprehensible viewpoint, so obviously the jokes are going to be a bit risqué.
And honestly, it's flattering that you think that TBP has that much of an influence in the manosphere, but we don't. These ideas have been around a lot longer than either subreddit.
"These ideas have been around a lot longer than either subreddit" They have been around since young boys started to become men.
I never read (I only been there a few times) about sexualizing minors in TRP but I believe you and that is creepy.
You would be surprise on how much women do that influence the "Manosphere".
I didn't mean men in general with the word "manosphere." The manosphere is the group of bloggers who came up with the redpill ideology. It's a mishmash of regressive MRAs, PUAs and MGTOWs.
See here:
http://vivalamanosphere.com/
http://www.returnofkings.com/
Lol u hav no idea wut ur talkin boot
> When you say "we" I take you are a blue piller. And if you are you broke the only rule I saw there. "Don't vote or comment on stuff that you find linked here." You should be banned from there.
Pretty sure the meta subs have the biggest overlap of any subreddits. I'm a subscriber of /r/TheBluePill, too, but found this drama here because I read here more often.
I'm a mod there and I missed this whole thing until i checked SRD.
This makes me strangely proud....
It just means I'm a lazy mod really :P
Sadly it doesn't say "except" when you sub to an other sub. Not trying to be a dick but out of 70 mods they should change that rule. Don't you think?
No, because TBP mods, apparently unlike you, are capable of using basic reasoning. -_-'
Go a different way.
WARNING TO ALL MEN: I'm sorry I'm giving up our secret but it's best for both sexes.
Ladies: Men are dumb shits. We fell in love with you the moment we saw you and will love you long after you leave. Yet we do some stupid shit on the whole trip. Most of us don't understand this. Because testosterone comes in play sometime we see rage as in TRP (because the girl in fourth grade laughed at him be because she said she couldn't like a boy that had muster on his sandwich. He might not remember that because us guy can't remember the last time we called our mother, plus the seed was planted. btw. the little girl doesn't have any blame here,)
Now this might seem sexist of me but I will say it anyways. Women are better at nurturing then men and men are better at loving. I'm a single father and I think my ex is much better at getting my kids ready for adulthood but I'm the one stopping my kids to smell the roses.
Wait, are you saying that a general "no brigading" rule should mean that a subscriber cannot comment in any other community, in case it is at any point linked? Because, again, I saw this post before the one in TBP.
This person is either a really good concern troll or they really need to go outside and get a little perspective.
They probably should stay away from convenience stores though, lest an idiot think they were planning on soliciting underage sex.
I'm only going by what it says...
"Don't vote or comment on stuff that you find linked here."
There is no and's or but's. If one subs to this they should follow the rules. Just because one belongs to other subs also doesn't mean the person can comment or vote because they came in an other way.
I do not believe you are this thick, but you are free to convince me otherwise.
>TBP fights TRP by sinking to their level.
Strange, I've never seen a person from TBP advocate rape or believe men are inferior.
I hate people who don't understand satire and context.
If a motherfucker says something stupid, then I mock them by taking their opinion to it's logical conclusion how does that make me the same as them?
By stooping to their level. Civil Rights was won by raising above.
Shit
Are you telling me I'm NOT Gandhi right now??????? ;_;
And also subreddits are JUST LIKE civil rights campaigns???? Lol
That's some stellar reading comprehension.
Uh, it says "Locate a suitable sexthing"... as in a 'thing' to have 'sex' with.
> How is sexting a 7-11 year old satire or circlejerking but wishing somebody a painful death not?
Besides not understanding the topics you're talking about, it seems you don't understand satire either. Content alone doesn't determine satire.
You could discuss killing people satirically (like TBP: "Men be logical and women be emotional that's why TRP-alphas love killing divorce court judges!") or seriously like TRP,
> The judge who ordered the support tho, that fucker would be dead. And then I would hope that more men under child support orders would kill their judges until we, as men, reclaimed our rights.
The same for sexting minors.
I seriously hope this helps. Content alone can't determine if something is satirical, because satire basically requires the writer's intent to oppose the literal meaning. Perhaps satire on these topics is offensive or inappropriate to you, but if you can't figure out how different writer intents qualify one case as satire and the other as sincere then you're struggling with basic comprehension.
Because childs don't feel, nor do they real.
I hope this includes calling for systemic violence against other demographics.
I personally remove things like "die cis scum" if/when they come up in Bluepill, if that's what you're referring to.
Now this I appreciate. Mods like you really are a godsend to such controversial subreddits. I mean, some rules can be quite draconian but actual threats or hypocrisy (the "no racism/slurs" rule in /r/conspiracy is the best example) just make communities look shittier than a farm-fresh load on the steps of the French Parliament.
Mmm, imaginary internet points disappearing! I guess someone hates when anti-TRPers also want accountability on the other side. Whatevs, haters gonna hate! :)
Accountability for what, exactly? What I read was a mod enforcing a rule, and then a redditor had a huge problem with this, whereupon they requested to be banned and had their wish granted. Where's the problem here?
Who knew acting like crazies actually attracts crazies.
Looks like talking about them also attracts them, as of late. Ancappers, AMRers, conspiratards, now more SJWs. Just like flies and shit.
Yeah SRD was far more enjoyable before they decided to camp here.
You weren't around when almost every single thread was about srs and lauerli, were you?
Oh I loved the Laurelai drama, gimme some of that please.
They used to come by and then leave. But the squatters' camps started forming up... and then more and more of them have been gathering. They should just occupy Wall Street or something.
The frontpage is so boring now. Everything's low hanging fruit but the mods failed to tag it appropriately.