/r/conservative posts many stories about beheadings except one done by a Christian. User says he was banned for "bigotry" when he tried to post it there. (np.reddit.com)
SubredditDrama
83 ups - 0 downs = 83 votes
63 comments submitted at 17:33:49 on Nov 2, 2014 by 75000_Tokkul
I was also banned for "bigotry" on /r/conservative for pointing out that the Southern Strategy happened after the Civil Rights Act got passed. They don't think it happened, even though Reagan and Nixon both talked about how they supported the right of the states to oppose forced integration.
And you can leave, Mr. South African apartheid increased quality of life.
It's rare to find me agreeing with the /r/con mod team
But I guess that's the measure: This guy is so racist that even /r/con doesn't want him around
You were probably banned for bigotry because you are a raving bigot, actually. Let's be fair.
Sometimes r/conservative gets it right.
The only thing I commented on that subreddit was me making the case that Reagan and Nixon both were championing states rights back when Southerners wanted the federal government to quit forcing schools and neighborhoods to be forcibly integrated.
dude
Are you denying that the Southern Strategy took place? Sure sounds like it.
What I'm saying is that your entire post history is nothing but filth, and maybe - just MAYBE - you got banned because people don't want to be associated with derpy racists like you. Even /r/conservative has a breaking point, mister "we europeans should arm ourselves against the invading immigrant hordes".
>"we europeans should arm ourselves against the invading immigrant hordes".
I've never said that. Don't get me wrong, I am all for gun ownership rights, but I've never said such a thing. I support gun ownership to protect me from anyone who is trying to threaten my life, regardless of what race or ethnicity they are.
you're cute
You too, babe
dude you got serious problems
Oh come on. I didn't even have to scroll down your userpage to find holocaust denial. And then we have this comment still just on the first fucking page.
>Sending a Pakistani to Pakistan is not "expulsion" to me. He would be going home, where he can live among his own people and create his own self determination in his own land. Also, because he got to enjoy European education, he can use those tools that we gave him through education to help make contributions to his own homeland.
It's hilarious. You're a cartoon character for racism.
[deleted]
>There's nothing wrong with being a Nazi despite popular belief. Hitler was right about many things.
.
>It's relevant because this is a place for Europeans to have discussions; we are currently discussing immigration to Europe from third world nations. Many Africans are savages and we refer to them as animals.
.
>No, we are not satirical, we just want what is best for our people. Instead of calling us stupid, please offer up some reasons why we should want third world shitskins in our countries.
.
>Yes, but we don't mean that they biologically aren't human when we call them animals. We mean that they are on a lower level than us. They are savages.
.
>What's wrong with racism?
.
>Well something has to be done. There's already millions of shitstains scattered throughout Europe and that's more than enough to ruin it. Should we just sit idly by? They're going to reproduce and their numbers are eventually going to be equal to that of white people. There's going to have to be a mass expulsion.
Lel.
Also this comment from you (in /r/whiterights) made me chuckle.
>The comments on the article are so full of ignorance.
I guess you don't understand irony right?
I don't deny that the Holocaust didn't happen. Jews were rounded up in concentration camps and many were mistreated during the war. I just find that there is a lack of evidence that there was any mass plot by Adolf Hitler to kill all the Jews. There is no document ever created by him that says he wanted to kill all Jews.
Aside from Goebbels writing about it in his diary.
>February 14, 1942: The Führer once again expressed his determination to clean up the Jews in Europe pitilessly. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it. The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them. Their destruction will go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies. We must hasten this process with cold ruthlessness.
And Eichmann mentioning it during interrogation and his memoirs.
>I never saw a written order, Herr Hauptmann. All I know is that Heydrich said to me: "The Führer has ordered the physical extermination of the Jews." He said that as clearly and surely as I'm repeating it now.
Also Himmler's physical therapist.
And the documents marked "Shown to the Fuhrer" about the murder of hundreds of thousands of Jews by Einsatzgruppen.
>Another Einsatzgruppen report, "Report to the Führer on Combating Partisans," ( No. 51, December 1942) reported that 363,211 Jews had been executed. The report had been typed in large type favored by Hitler (who hated to wear his reading glasses) and was signed by Himmler. It was included in the select documents placed before Hitler and marked "Shown to the Führer ."
Literally a 30s google will pull up all these documents. It'll also pull up the definition of holocaust denial.
>Holocaust denial includes any of the following claims: that the German Nazi government's Final Solution policy aimed only at deporting Jews from the Reich, and included no policy to exterminate Jews; that Nazi authorities did not use extermination camps and gas chambers to mass murder Jews; and that the actual number of Jews killed was significantly (typically an order of magnitude) lower than the historically accepted figure of 5 to 6 million.
You've fulfilled literally all of these requirements. Gj. You're a holocaust denier.