One user in /r/TiA has had enough of the anti-feminism. Is Christina Hoff Sommers the only good feminist left? (reddit.com)

SubredditDrama

7 ups - 0 downs = 7 votes

41 comments submitted at 05:23:29 on Oct 28, 2014 by Gishin

  • [-]
  • mach-2
  • 11 Points
  • 05:47:38, 28 October

Holy shit. Dominium vindicta, that white rights poster is getting upvoted for posting /pol/copypasta. Holy fucking shit /r/TumblrInAction

  • [-]
  • agnmp
  • 1 Points
  • 06:30:57, 28 October

I looked through the thread and only see he posted 2 things. I don't see anything about white rights in either of those. By mentioning he's a "white rights" poster, are you suggesting people in /r/TumblrInAction are upvoting "white rights" rhetoric or that they're upvoting him because he's racist? I don't get it.

The things he posted:

>http://i.imgur.com/DBENxcd.jpg

>http://i.imgur.com/FGR9SDc.jpg

  • [-]
  • mach-2
  • 4 Points
  • 06:33:33, 28 October

Both. Those are /pol/ copypasta that you're looking at. It;s what drives the whole anti-SJW anti-feminist bollocks that seems to have envoloped much of Reddit nowadays. I mention he is a whiterights poster because he gets around as do other white rights posters that hound /r/TumblrInAction like /u/evilwhiteoppressor .

  • [-]
  • agnmp
  • -1 Points
  • 06:37:25, 28 October

That makes absolutely no sense. How are the people who look at those images upvoting "white rights" rhetoric? Neither of those are about race, even if you find them disagreeable. My point is that you're implying false things, and it's telling that you didn't even bother to link to his statements in your original comment.

He might be a racist, but he also posted this to TESLore. Are you suggesting that people interested in TES lore are also racists for upvoting a white rights poster? You've probably unknowingly upvoted racists as well.

  • [-]
  • mach-2
  • -2 Points
  • 06:47:31, 28 October

> That makes absolutely no sense. How are the people who look at those images upvoting "white rights" rhetoric? Neither of those are about race, even if you find them disagreeable. My point is that you're implying false things, and it's telling that you didn't even bother to link to his statements in your original comment.

The hell are you on about? Quote where I said the people in that thread where upvoting whiterights rhetoric. Please. Quote it. I said they were upvoting /pol/ copypasta from a white rights poster. Nothing false about that statement.

I also love how you went all the way down through his history, skipping all the racist shit on the first 3 pages to dig up his post on G.O.T? are you serious?

  • [-]
  • agnmp
  • -2 Points
  • 06:56:41, 28 October

>The hell are you on about? Quote where I said the people in that thread where upvoting whiterights rhetoric. Please. Quote it. I said they were upvoting /pol/ copypasta from a white rights poster. Nothing false about that statement.

I already explained. Your comment was undoubtedly misleading people into thinking that. People upvoting those images aren't upvoting anything about race. His comments weren't even in the linked comment chain, so they'd have to go to the full thread and ctrl+f his comment to even understand what his comments were, or they'd just accept what you're implying as fact (hint: people will choose the option that takes less effort). Also, saying it's "from /pol/" is another vague statement that combines with his status to make an even stronger implication. And also, you directly state it here:

>>By mentioning he's a "white rights" poster, are you suggesting people in /r/TumblrInAction are upvoting "white rights" rhetoric or that they're upvoting him because he's racist?

>Both.

.

>I also love how you went all the way down through his history, skipping all the racist shit on the first 3 pages to dig up his post on G.O.T? are you serious?

I love how utterly idiotic this statement is. Do you understand the point of my comment? No offense, but it was extremely fucking simple. People can upvote racists without realizing that they're racist. I linked to a comment where he wasn't discussing race. Do you understand the fucking point of skipping his racist shit? I don't give a shit about this racist.

Such a fucking stupid statement. Are you fucking serious?

  • [-]
  • mach-2
  • 1 Points
  • 07:01:34, 28 October

I said they were upvoting /pol/ copypasta from a white rights poster. Nothing false about that statement.

Read. If you were misled then that's on you. NOT PEOPLE. People were not misled because my statement was clear. I was mainly highlighting who and what they were upvoting due to the hilarity of TIA being a sub that mocks extremes. Do you understand now? Or are you still offended that I said what I said?

> I love how utterly idiotic this statement is. Do you understand the point of my comment? No offense, but it was extremely fucking simple. People can upvote racists without realizing that they're racist. I linked to a comment where he wasn't discussing race. Do you understand the fucking point of skipping his racist shit? I don't give a shit about this racist. > Such a fucking stupid statement. Are you fucking serious?

You are without a doubt the... You know what, it's too late for this. I won't engage you in this. I;ve been banned before. Won't risk it. Auf Wiedersehen.

  • [-]
  • agnmp
  • -3 Points
  • 07:12:32, 28 October

>I said they were upvoting /pol/ copypasta from a white rights poster. Nothing false about that statement.

>Read. If you were misled then that's on you. NOT PEOPLE. People were not misled because my statement was clear. I was mainly highlighting who and what they were upvoting due to the hilarity of TIA being a sub that mocks extremes. Do you understand now? Or are you still offended that I said what I said?

Your comment was misleading or worthless. Without a doubt. It's not "on me". Nobody has any idea what he's posting based on your comment. You took the time to evaluate his comments, but couldn't even link to them?

>I was mainly highlighting who

Yes, that's the point. People don't keep track of all the racists on reddit. Just like that comment in TESLore (do you understand yet?). Stating that people are "upvoting a white rights poster" without mentioning that he's not talking about "white rights" is deliberately misleading.

>You are without a doubt the... You know what, it's too late for this. I won't engage you in this.

If you're not going to engage, then don't make these stupid half statements. Your second statement where you imply that I'm "skipping all the racist shit to dig up his post". You didn't expect that to not be taken as an insulting lie, did you?

  • [-]
  • mach-2
  • -1 Points
  • 07:19:36, 28 October

> Your comment was misleading or worthless. Without a doubt. It's not "on me". Nobody has any idea what he's posting based on your comment. You took the time to evaluate his comments, but couldn't even link to them?

Jesus Christ did you even click the link. Just stop. You've made yourself look idiotic. You misunderstood the comment and are offended I'm saying shit about your precious TIA. Don't worry baby. The world is not ending alright?

> Yes, that's the point. People don't keep track of all the racists on reddit. Just like that comment in TESLore (do you understand yet?). Stating that people are "upvoting a white rights poster" without mentioning that he's not talking about "white rights" is deliberately misleading.

On SRD we do. People know who flytape is. On the metasphere they are quite popular. Sorry mate.

> If you're not going to engage, then don't make these stupid half statements. Your second statement where you imply that I'm "skipping all the racist shit to dig up his post". You didn't expect that to not be taken as an insulting lie, did you?

I don't give an utter fuck what you took it as. You clearly posted a 3 day old link as proof that dominum vindicta also posts "other things" so TIA users would not know he was a neo nazi. But whne I showed you that literally his first pages are filled with racist shit, you got offended and are taking things personal. Go to sleep.

  • [-]
  • agnmp
  • 1 Points
  • 07:56:03, 28 October

>Jesus Christ did you even click the link. Just stop. You've made yourself look idiotic. You misunderstood the comment and are offended I'm saying shit about your precious TIA. Don't worry baby. The world is not ending alright?

Which link? I didn't misunderstand anything except your disgusting tendency to circlejerk then start insulting everyone around you if they happen to not immediately circlejerk with you. It's the reason you got banned. It's disgusting and pathetic.

>On SRD we do. People know who flytape is. On the metasphere they are quite popular. Sorry mate.

I'm talking about all the people that upvoted him in TESLore and those in TumblrInAction. What the fuck is the point of mentioning that people on SRD keep track? Sorry mate? What the fuck are you sorry for? Are you just looking to spam more idiotic condescending circlejerk material?

>I don't give an utter fuck what you took it as. You clearly posted a 3 day old link as proof that dominum vindicta also posts "other things" so TIA users would not know he was a neo nazi. But whne I showed you that literally his first pages are filled with racist shit, you got offended and are taking things personal. Go to sleep.

What an utterly fucking idiotic strawman. It beggars belief. People wouldn't know he's a neo nazi because people don't look through every fucking person's posting history before voting on a comment they make. That's why people don't know it. Not because he posts "other things". What the fuck does a 3-day-old link matter? It doesn't even matter whether it was him that made the comment on TESLore or if it was Hitler. The point is that people don't know someone's fucking beliefs just from looking at their username. It's so fucking simple, at this point I'm certain you're acting like an utter moron to avoid admitting you're wrong.

Get this through your fucking skull. It doesn't matter what his fucking posting history is. People aren't going to look through every fucking person's posting history before voting on a comment they made. Your comment was intentionally misleading and shitty. That's it.