I was just banned from r/ShitRedditSays and r/SRSDiscussion (self.blackladies)

blackladies

48 ups - 31 downs = 17 votes

For reminding the good white folks over at SRS that they have blind spots when it comes to race, pointing out a few racist comments, and accusing a poster (who sent me a few racist replies) of racism. Hopefully some of them will post screenshots here.

Just when I was warming up to the idea of white "allies." I guess it's my fault for going into white spaces.

Edit: ok, now a mod is harassing me after I asked not to be messaged again. What may I do?

Edit #2: PMs.

Edit #3: SRSDiscussion Thread

Edit #4: I was explained this is not harassment since I initiated the convs. Thanks!

Edit #5: I understand I was the one who sent the first PMs but I also asked ArchangelleSamaelle to stop. Yet, here they are messaging me again. Come on, now.

Edit #6: If you start a conversation you lose the right to end it. Or some such. I don't know.

Edit #7: First, I apologize to the /r/blackladies users, modteam, and all those who were disturbed by my white genocide comments. It was irresponsible of me to express those opinions publicly. I'll keep that kind of rhetoric private. Second, I'd like to thank the SRS mods for being proactive in handling this matter; I'm happy to know it was a WoC who banned me and that I received the benefit of the doubt for being a PoC. It's great to know we're given special status. I hope that you continue to improve your white spaces and make them more friendly to PoC. Thirdly, I apologize to any white ladies I offended; it was not my intention to suggest you white ladies lack agency, at least not when compared to PoC. Finally, to the redditors lighting up my inbox with racist remarks or calling me Hitler, I love you.

92 comments submitted at 01:08:17 on Jan 10, 2014 by BlackDominican

  • [-]
  • afropunk3
  • 43 Points
  • 14:16:04, 10 January

Yeah, I really cannot take your side in this one.

To be perfectly clear, ArchangelleSamaelle wasn't "harassing" you; by repeatedly using the phrase "white trash," you actually served to antagonize her and escalate the situation. The main problem here wasn't the orignal statement that you posted (in my opinion, that statement was innocuous and the mods seemingly overreacted); the real problem is your immature method of conflict resolution.

Oh, and on an unrelated note, I find it quite disturbing that you would casually discuss your desire to "reduce" the American white population by 85%. There's a name for that kind of thing; if I recall, according to international human rights agencies, it is known as genocide. I genuinely hope that you were being facetious, because advocating for "forced population reduction" is pretty revolting. I would never contenance mass-murder, and I have never met anyone who would support a morally bankrupt endeavor like the one that you describe so nonchalantly. As social justice advocates, I think that we all seek to bring an end to oppression through peace rather than violent conflict; it is absolutely wrong to focus on a race war as a legitimate means of fighting anti-black prejudice.

  • [-]
  • BlackDominican
  • -22 Points
  • 14:51:01, 10 January

Thank you for your reply.

I'm sorry that you were upset by my genocide comment. I understand it's considered by many to be morally reprehensible but I still believe that if the white US population was significantly lowered, whether violently or not, it would be a boon for every other group in the US.

As for the mod, my goal was to insult this person. I was not trying to end the conflict prior to the two linkposts I sent them. It is immature but that's all I wanted to do at that point in time.

  • [-]
  • egotripping
  • 4 Points
  • 16:44:19, 10 January

How would you suggest the white population be lowered?

  • [-]
  • BlackDominican
  • -15 Points
  • 17:34:31, 10 January

The easiest, most direct way is to terminate them through violent means. Majority of people will find this problematic because of moral concerns as well as the fact that most of us are trained to value white lives more than other lives. We also lack numbers to actually go that route.

Another way is to do it percentually, by increasing our % share of the population. I dislike this one because it turns black women into incubators. Related, one may also encourage more non-US black people to immigrate in mass numbers; this option creates a lot of cultural problems but at least we'd be dealing with black people.

The current method in place is voluntary on the part of whites. In the US, they're only reproducing to replace current population numbers (mostly trailer trash having a bunch of children). I think US Census projections indicate the white population will nonetheless decrease by 2050. Hopefully, those trends sustain and by 2100 white people in the US could number well below 100 million. I'd be dead by then, though.

:-/

  • [-]
  • egotripping
  • 10 Points
  • 17:40:24, 10 January

Do you find your first option problematic?

>Majority of people will find this problematic because of moral concerns as well as the fact that most of us are trained to value white lives more than other lives

While that may be true, I don't think your being genuine in saying that's why most people would find it problematic.

  • [-]
  • BlackDominican
  • -14 Points
  • 17:44:51, 10 January

I find it problematic but I see it as a necessary evil. When the other side actively hates you, considers you inferior, and continues to act maliciously towards you, it's best to keep violence as a defensive tool. As long as white people continue to hold power, we will not be able to live our lives peacefully.

Why do you think most people would find it problematic?

  • [-]
  • egotripping
  • 16 Points
  • 17:58:10, 10 January

I think most people find murder and furthermore genocide downright disturbing, regardless of the race in question. I don't mean to go all poe's law here, but this is some "literally hitler" type shit.

  • [-]
  • [deleted]
  • 9 Points
  • 21:46:00, 10 January

>The easiest, most direct way is to terminate them through violent means. Majority of people will find this problematic because of moral concerns as well as the fact that most of us are trained to value white lives more than other lives

Personally, I find "violent termination" of any group really, really upsetting amd disturbing. As do most rational people. To suggest that people oppose a massive bloody genocide of white people because they value white life more is absurd. You take such a hateful, vitriolic tone, and I find it disturbing and morally atrocious.

  • [-]
  • Anaebira
  • 15 Points
  • 18:01:04, 10 January

> The easiest, most direct way is to terminate them through violent means.

Even if there are only 10 white people who are actively not racist, this is just atrocious on so many levels, to children, to our sense of history, for example.

Remember, "He who fights too long against dragons becomes a dragon himself; and if you gaze too long into the abyss, the abyss will gaze into you."

― Friedrich Nietzsche

I think you're spending too much time on Reddit, there be dragons here.